"We the People," collective guilt, and Original Sin

[ Attachment content not displayed ]

It's true that many people complain about things after the fact. In their defense however, it's only fair to point out that (1) they rarely have power to stop a government at the time of the action, and (2) there are many governments doing many things which are wrong. It's not always clear at the time something is done how bad the results will be, and defenders of liberty only have so much time and energy to divide among all the things governments are doing wrong.

  But my original question was, why don't you distinguish between individual Americans and the U.S. government? Despite the "IMU" slogan, I'm sure you don't really think they are one and the same. As Michael Edelstein points out, if that were true then it would be reasonable to put individuals like yourself and myself on trial for murder, robbery, etc., since governments have clearly done these things in our name.

  We can avoid this dilemma by making it clear that governments are *not* "us," and that we are responsible for our own actions, just as committing crimes in the name of "the people," without those peoples' consent, by means of coercion against them, do not share responsibility with their victims, but are themselves fully responsible for their actions.

Love & liberty,
        <<< starchild >>>

Hi Eric,

I can see you are not a believer in "better late than never"! I
stand guilty before you of not speaking up when the U.S. invaded
Iraq, but I feel it is better to make amends for my inaction now than
never. So, I protest.

Marcy

--- In lpsf-discuss@yahoogroups.com, "eric dupree"
<dupreeconsults@...> wrote:

Many silently allow the gov to do what they've been doing.Then

complain

about what was done and then protest which should have come much

earlier!

  From: Starchild
  To: lpsf-discuss@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: [lpsf-discuss] Re: "We the People," collective guilt, and
  Original Sin
  Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 02:51:50 -0800

  I'm sorry Eric, I don't understand your response.

  <<< starchild >>>

  > When we protest after the fact its "we the people"...
  >> From: Starchild <sfdreamer@...>
  >> To: lpsf-discuss@yahoogroups.com
  >> Subject: [lpsf-discuss] Re: "We the People," collective guilt,

and

  >> Original Sin
  >> Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 02:18:57 -0800
  >>
  >>
  >> Eric,
  >>
  >> You correctly distinguish between people in the Middle East,

and

  >> the regimes that claim jurisdiction over them ("Now I'm not

saying

  >> the countries itself"). If this is a valid distinction, isn't
  >> there a similarly valid distinction to be made between

individual

  >> Americans, and the U.S. government? Elsewhere in the same
  >> paragraph, you're still saying "we" when you're obviously
  >> referring to the U.S. government.
  >>
  >> Love & liberty,
  >> <<< starchild >>>
  >>
  >>
  >>
  >>> Desert Storm for one. We left and afterwards and still was
  >>> attacked by Middle Easterners.
  >>> Now I'm not saying the countries itself. Which makes these
  >>> battles more difficult. We must root out threats of

individuals

  >>> within those nations.
  >>> We will rule nations who's citizens attack us. Americans must

go

  >>> in and find those that'll make us another Israel suicide (be)
  >>> bombed > land.
  >>> Its a harsh lesson for countries to except, "thou Kingdom

come,

  >>> thou will be done."
  >>> Everyone in the world aren't peace activist. So we have the

Peace

  >>> Corps/Vista and the Marine Corps. which are my alma maters.
  >>>
  >>>> From: "Mike Denny" <mike@...>
  >>>> To: lpsf-discuss@yahoogroups.com
  >>>> Subject: RE: [lpsf-discuss] Re: "We the People," collective
  >>> guilt, and Original Sin
  >>>> Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 21:01:41 -0800
  >>>>
  >>>>
  >>>> Hi Eric,
  >>>>
  >>>> Could you please be specific about where the US has withdrawn
  >>>> troops from around the world? I'm not aware of them and see

more

  >>>> troops and countries than less.
  >>>>
  >>>> After that, could you please directly connect the troop
  withdrawals
  >>>> you mentioned to our being "attacked"?
  >>>>
  >>>> Thanks Eric...looking forward to hearing from you.
  >>>>
  >>>> Mike
  >>>>
  >>>> From: lpsf-discuss@yahoogroups.com
  >>>> [mailto:lpsf-discuss@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of eric

dupree

  >>>> Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2007 8:49 PM
  >>>> To: lpsf-discuss@yahoogroups.com
  >>>> Subject: Re: [lpsf-discuss] Re: "We the People," collective
  guilt,
  >>>> and Original Sin
  >>>>
  >>>> We tried that and was attacked?
  >>>>> From: dredelstein@...
  >>>>> To: lpsf-discuss@yahoogroups.com
  >>>>> Subject: Re: [lpsf-discuss] Re: "We the People," collective
  >>>>> guilt, and Original Sin
  >>>>> Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 21:10:33 -0800
  >>>>>
  >>>>>
  >>>>> Eric,
  >>>>>
  >>>>> My answer: in response to 911, withdraw all US troops from
  >>> around the globe.
  >>>>>
  >>>>> Best, Michael
  >>>>>
  >>>>>
  >>>>> From: eric dupree
  >>>>> To: lpsf-discuss@yahoogroups.com
  >>>>> Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 7:00 PM
  >>>>> Subject: Re: [lpsf-discuss] Re: "We the People," collective
  >>>>> guilt, and Original Sin
  >>>>>
  >>>>>
  >>>>> Iraq, Iraq, Iraq, 911, 911, 911! War is hell!
  >>>>> I feel for the people but the gov had to be dealt with.
  >>>>> Just like the British. The Iraqi people weren't wrong but

their

  >>>>> leader/s had us in the position of feeling threaten and

needed

  to
  >>>>> be removed.
  >>>>> What would others have done in the wake? Everytime I ask the
  >>>>> question it doesn't get answered...
  >>>>>
  >>>>> At some point our gov must adhere to "to provide for the

common

  >>>>> defense!" or contest that portion of the constitution?
  >>>>>> From: dredelstein@...
  >>>>>> To: lpsf-discuss@yahoogroups.com
  >>>>>> Subject: Re: [lpsf-discuss] Re: "We the People,"

collective >

  >>>>> guilt, and Original Sin
  >>>>>> Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 18:37:54 -0800
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>> If "we" have been bombing Iraq, then "we" better turn
  ourselves
  >>>>>> in. "We" are mass murderers.
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>> Count me out.
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>> Best, Michael
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>> From: Starchild
  >>>>>> To: lpsf-discuss@yahoogroups.com
  >>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 7:36 AM
  >>>>>> Subject: Re: [lpsf-discuss] Re: "We the People,"

collective >

  >>>>> guilt, and Original Sin
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>> Eric,
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>> I approve of the American Revolution in retrospect, just

as I

  >
  >>>>> approve of many historical events, but I can't claim it as
  "mine"
  >>>>>> or "ours" any more than the signing of the Magna Carta was
  >>>>> "mine" > or "ours." It wasn't my revolution, I wasn't alive

in

  >>>>> the late > 1700s.
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>> Love & liberty,
  >>>>>> <<< starchild >>>
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>> Regardless, not just who votes and or protest, by not

Cyprus

  >>>>>> Attuck'in (first ti die for our revolution) we're allowing

too

  >>>>>> much to accur!
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>> From: "Amarcy D. Berry"
  >>>>>> To: lpsf-discuss@yahoogroups.com
  >>>>>> Subject: [lpsf-discuss] Re: "We the People," collective
  >>>>> guilt, > and Original Sin
  >>>>>> Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 18:41:37 -0000
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>> Hi Starchild,
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>> Yup, I am with you on pretty much all counts on your e-

mail;

  >>>>>> except
  >>>>>> for the last sentence, since you have no control over

Original

  >>>>>> Sin,
  >>>>>> but you do have control over the scum you put in office.

(If

  your
  >>>>>> next question is who is "you", yup again, you are right, my
  reply
  >>>>>> would be, it's We the People!)
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>> Marcy
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>> --- In lpsf-discuss@yahoogroups.com, Starchild <sfdreamer@>
  >>>>>> wrote:
  >>>>>>>
  >>>>>>> Marcy & Eric,
  >>>>>>>
  >>>>>>> Who are "We the People" in your messages below who "put

the

  >>>>>> scums in
  >>>>>>> office" and "got us into this war?" Are you including only
  >>>>>>> people
  >>>>>>> eligible to vote, when apportioning blame for who holds
  >>>>>>> political
  >>>>>>> power? That would imply that persons under 18 and many

others

  >>>>>>> are
  >>>>>> *not*
  >>>>>>> part of "We the People."
  >>>>>>>
  >>>>>>> Of course one can easily have more impact on the political
  >>>>>> process by
  >>>>>>> engaging in Internet activism, getting a letter published

in

  the
  >>>>>> paper,
  >>>>>>> or so forth, than by voting. As a matter of fact, one

doesn't

  >>>>>>> even
  >>>>>> need
  >>>>>>> to reside in the United States or be a U.S. citizen in

order

  to
  >>>>>> have a
  >>>>>>> greater effect on U.S. politics than the average American
  voter.
  >>>>>> So
  >>>>>>> then, is the entire world to blame for the Republicrats?

Or

  only
  >>>>>> the
  >>>>>>> people with enough education, resources and free time to

be

  >>>>>> politically
  >>>>>>> active? Then again, a good many of the people lacking in
  >>>>>> knowledge,
  >>>>>>> time or resources might have had these things in abundance
  had
  >>>>>> they
  >>>>>>> made different choices, so that doesn't get all those
  >>>>>>> "foreigners"
  >>>>>> born
  >>>>>>> into decent circumstances off the hook so easily.
  >>>>>>>
  >>>>>>> By a similar standard, of course, anyone who had the

ability

  >>>>>> to
  >>>>>>> intervene in a positive way in the life of a child even
  slightly
  >>>>>> (being
  >>>>>>> friendly to a tot when encountering him on the street with
  his
  >>>>>> parents,
  >>>>>>> for example), but didn't, bears part of the responsibility
  when
  >>>>>> that
  >>>>>>> kid, as a result of a troubled childhood where he didn't

get

  >>>>>> enough
  >>>>>>> positivity, later goes out and robs a convenience store.
  >>>>>> Clearly "We
  >>>>>>> the People" are to blame for all these shootings,

muggings,

  and
  >>>>>>> so
  >>>>>> on
  >>>>>>> that one reads about in the media, since these things
  happened
  >>>>>> in "our"
  >>>>>>> society and any of us could have done something more to
  prevent
  >>>>>> the
  >>>>>>> circumstances leading up to them than we did. As a matter

of

  >>>>>>> fact,
  >>>>>> even
  >>>>>>> if you were a model parent , you're still equally

responsible

  as
  >>>>>> part
  >>>>>>> of "We the People" when it comes to doling out the blame.

And

  if
  >>>>>> you're
  >>>>>>> not a parent, then it's still your fault for not having

kids,

  >>>>>>> since
  >>>>>> if
  >>>>>>> you'd had good kids, they could have helped exert positive
  peer
  >>>>>>> pressure on the troubled ones.
  >>>>>>>
  >>>>>>> You're with me on all that, right? After all, Libertarians
  >>>>>> are
  >>>>>>> (apparently, in your view) no less responsible for Bush

and

  the
  >>>>>> current
  >>>>>>> members of Congress being elected as were those who

actively

  >>>>>> supported
  >>>>>>> them, since we're just as much a part of "We the People."
  >>>>>> Individual
  >>>>>>> behavior and consent have nothing to do with our
  >>>>>> responsibility/guilt
  >>>>>>> -- it's an automatic thing, kind of like Original Sin.

Right?

  >>>>>>>
  >>>>>>> Love & liberty,
  >>>>>>> <<< starchild >>>
  >>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>> Here, here Marcy!
  >>>>>>>>> From: "Amarcy D. Berry" <amarcyb@>
  >>>>>>>>> To: lpsf-discuss@yahoogroups.com
  >>>>>>>>> Subject: [lpsf-discuss] Re: I wanna rouse some rabble! -
  STOP
  >>>>>> THE
  >>>>>>>> WAR RALLY
  >>>>>>>>> Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 21:35:41 -0000
  >>>>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>>> Thank you, Eric. For years now, I have been a lonely

voice

  on
  >>>>>> this
  >>>>>>>>> List communicating to my fellow Libertarians my belief

that

  >>>>>> 1) "We
  >>>>>>>>> the People" put the scums in office that cause so much
  >>>>>>>>> chagrin;
  >>>>>> and
  >>>>>>>>> 2) As Eric stated so well: better to have public support
  than
  >>>>>> mere
  >>>>>>>>> attention.
  >>>>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>>> Thus, SFTW Coalition hopes to add its voice to the other
  >>>>>> numerous
  >>>>>>>>> rally's that are taking place throughout the country,

and

  >>>>>>>>> state
  >>>>>>>>> simply and peacefully that we are encouraging our

elected

  >>>>>>>>> representatives to stop the war by stopping its funding.
  >>>>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>>> Regards,
  >>>>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>>> Marcy
  >>>>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>>> --- In lpsf-discuss@yahoogroups.com, "eric dupree"
  >>>>>>>>> <dupreeconsults@> wrote:
  >>>>>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>>>> Yeah and the house flags should go up in flames also!

And

  the
  >>>>>> Cali
  >>>>>>>>> flag and all the state flag the voted in the prez.
  >>>>>>>>>> We are more than just a presidential country...Bush did
  not
  >>>>>> get us
  >>>>>>>>> into this war. We the people did and now are shucking

the

  >>>>>>>>> blame?
  >>>>>>>>>>> From: Starchild <sfdreamer@>
  >>>>>>>>>>> To: lpsf-discuss@...m
  >>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [lpsf-discuss] Re: I wanna rouse some
  rabble! -
  >>>>>> STOP
  >>>>>>>>> THE WAR RALLY
  >>>>>>>>>>> Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 00:53:52 -0800
  >>>>>>>>>>>>> How about burning a big flag -- not the American

flag,

  >>>>>> but a
  >>>>>>>>> flag
  >>>>>>>>>>> bearing the presidential seal? I think that would

send an

  >
  >>>>>>>>>> appropriate message, and get some media attention,

without

  >>>>>> the >
  >>>>>>>>>> misguided backlash from some quarters that might greet

the

  >>>>>>>>> burning
  >>>>>>>>>>> of "Old Glory," or the implicit message of violence of
  >>>>>> burning
  >>>>>>>>> the
  >>>>>>>>>>> would-be king in effigy.
  >>>>>>>>>>>> By the way, I also previously raised the idea of

having

  a
  >>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>>>> Libertarian MC (Marc Joffe?) for the event to guarantee
  the
  >>>>>>>>>> LP
  >>>>>>>>> some
  >>>>>>>>>>> visibility there, but don't recall seeing any

responses

  to
  >>>>>> this
  >>>>>>>>>>> suggestion. What do those involved in planning the

rally

  >>>>>> think
  >>>>>>>>>>> about these ideas?
  >>>>>>>>>>>> Love & liberty,
  >>>>>>>>>>> <<< starchild >>>
  >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ooops my first message got botched up; so here goes
  >>>>>> again.
  >>>>>>>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>>>>>> Dear Ron,
  >>>>>>>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you for the suggestion of slash and burn!

However,

  I
  >>>>>>>>> think the
  >>>>>>>>>>>> Stop Funding the War Coalition voted from the start

to

  >>>>>> have a
  >>>>>>>>>>>> peaceful rally, such as "the people peaceably to
  >>>>>> assemble, and
  >>>>>>>>> to
  >>>>>>>>>>>> petition the government for a redress of

grievances." I

  >>>>>>>>> supposed the
  >>>>>>>>>>>> idea is to walk the walk; if you call for peace, it
  would
  >>>>>> seem
  >>>>>>>>> to me
  >>>>>>>>>>>> strange to do it through any kind of violence. But,
  >>>>>> that's just
  >>>>>>>>> my
  >>>>>>>>>>>> opinion.
  >>>>>>>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
  >>>>>>>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>>>>>> Marcy
  >>>>>>>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>>>>>> --- In lpsf-discuss@yahoogroups.com, "Amarcy D.

Berry"

  >>>>>>>>> <amarcyb@>
  >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
  >>>>>>>>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>>>>>>> --- In lpsf-discuss@yahoogroups.com, Ron Getty
  >>>>>>>> <tradergroupe@>
  >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dear Everyone;
  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> For those of you involved in the Stop The War

Rally -

  >>>>>>>>> here's a
  >>>>>>>>>>>>> forwarded message from Aster Francesca with a

thought

  >>>>>> for
  >>>>>>>>>>>>> consideration as the capper for the Stop The War

Rally

  >>>>>> event
  >>>>>>>> -
  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Burn his royal highness King George the II in
  >>>>>> effigy!!!
  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> That'll certainly get the attention of the FBI and
  >>>>>> Homeland
  >>>>>>>>>>>>> Security and Secret Service Presidential Protection
  >>>>>> Detail
  >>>>>>>> and
  >>>>>>>>>>>>> Government Office Building Polizei - let the news

media

  >>>>>> know
  >>>>>>>>> in
  >>>>>>>>>>>>> advance what you are planning on doing - as this is

the

  >>>>>> type
  >>>>>>>>> of eye
  >>>>>>>>>>>>> candy they just love for the in-depth 10 second news
  >>>>>> bites
  >>>>>>>>> for 5-6-
  >>>>>>>>>>>> 7-
  >>>>>>>>>>>>> 9-10-11.
  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> BTW: Going to have a band there playing a dirge or

at

  >>>>>> least
  >>>>>>>>> a
  >>>>>>>>>>>>> trumpeter playing Taps for all the fallen dead both
  >>>>>> military
  >>>>>>>>> and
  >>>>>>>>>>>>> civilian? How about a dragon dance to scare away the
  >>>>>> evils of
  >>>>>>>>> war
  >>>>>>>>>>>>> followed by the traditional firecracker ball to

really

  >>>>>> blast
  >>>>>>>>> away
  >>>>>>>>>>>> the
  >>>>>>>>>>>>> demons of war?
  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> BTW: Will there be lots of colorful banners?
  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ron Getty
  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> SF Libertarian
  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Aster Francesca <ms_shiris@>
  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: Salon_Liberty@yahoogroups.com
  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2007 7:27:58 PM
  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: {Salon Liberty} I wanna rouse some rabble!
  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> A very interesting peice from Charles Johnson's

site

  >>>>>> on the
  >>>>>>>>>>>>> American Revolution:
  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rad Geek People's Daily 2007-02-24 – Over My Shoulder #32: Mark Kurlansky on the Revolution before the Revolutionary War, from Nonviolence: Twenty-Five Lessons from the History of a Dangerous Idea
  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey, why doesn't someone (say, the anti-war

movement)

  >>>>>> get
  >>>>>>>>>>>> together
  >>>>>>>>>>>>> and very publically hang George II* in effigy-

perhaps

  >>>>>> in a
  >>>>>>>>>>>>> deliberately Colonial style?
  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> If your not-quite-voiced answer is: "I'm afraid

what

  >>>>>> would
  >>>>>>>>> happen
  >>>>>>>>>>>>> to me if I did so", then you have discovered the

reason

  >>>>>>>>> someone
  >>>>>>>>>>>> needs
  >>>>>>>>>>>>> to do it, before your worried fear is certain fact.
  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Many, many people I know from friends to

colleagues to

  >>>>>>>>> clients to
  >>>>>>>>>>>>> random people I meet in the supermarket are

beginning

  to
  >>>>>>>>> conclude
  >>>>>>>>>>>>> they truly do need to worry. All of these people

would

  >>>>>>>>> understand
  >>>>>>>>>>>>> the meaning of a public burning instantly and would

all

  >>>>>> come
  >>>>>>>>> away
  >>>>>>>>>>>>> from hearing of one that much more consciously

radical.

  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I know some of you are involved in the anti-war
  >>>>>> movement.
  >>>>>>>>> Has
  >>>>>>>>>>>>> anyone thought of this?
  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> love and strife,
  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aster Francesca {)(*)(}
  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Or why don'twe getinthe habit of protesting I
  >>>>>> wannother
  >>>>>>>>>>>> officials
  >>>>>>>>>>>>> by beheading them? DEA and Homeland Security

officials

  >>>>>> come
  >>>>>>>> to
  >>>>>>>>>>>>> mind. Or local police commisioners.
  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why don't sex workers publically get together and
  >>>>>> declare
  >>>>>>>>> the
  >>>>>>>>>>>> cops
  >>>>>>>>>>>>> and the feds the occupying army there are? Jailed
  >>>>>> prostitutes
  >>>>>>>>> are
  >>>>>>>>>>>>> patriarchy's political prisoners. They're arresting

us

  >>>>>> and
  >>>>>>>>> killing
  >>>>>>>>>>>>> us, and we protest by running ballot initiatives,
  >>>>>> throwing
  >>>>>>>>> parties,
  >>>>>>>>>>>>> and having tea with politicians. What gives with

that?

  >>>>>> We
  >>>>>>>>> should
  >>>>>>>>>>>> be
  >>>>>>>>>>>>> declaring people who would ruin lives for practicing
  >>>>>> their
  >>>>>>>>> living
  >>>>>>>>>>>>> steppe raiders and tyrants beyond the boundaries of
  >>>>>>>>> civilisation.
  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Freude, schöner Götterfunken
  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tochter aus Elysium,
  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wir betreten feuertrunken,
  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Himmlische, dein Heiligtum!
  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Deine Zauber binden wieder
  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Was die Mode streng geteilt.
  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alle Menschen werden Brüder
  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wo dein sanfter Flügel weilt.
  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> email ms_shiris@
  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Find what you need at prices you'll love. Compare
  >>>>>> products
  >>>>>>>>> and
  >>>>>>>>>>>> save
  >>>>>>>>>>>>> at MSN® Shopping.
  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>>>> =
  >>>>>>>>>> Large Selection of Pedicure Chairs
  >>>>>>>>>> We offer a large selection of pedicure spas and

pedicure

  >>>>>> equipment
  >>>>>>>>> worldwide at discount pricing.
  >>>>>>>>>> http://a8-asy.a8ww.net/a8-ads/adftrclick?
  >>>>>>>>> redirectid=c25238dd0ecb4fc5fd5e6d9847623910
  >>>>>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>> =
  >>>>>>>> Ruth's Chris Steak House
  >>>>>>>> Serious steak and fine wines. Easy online reservations.

Book

  >>>>>> your
  >>>>>>>> table now.
  >>>>>>>> http://a8-asy.a8ww.net/a8-ads/
  >>>>>>>> adftrclick?redirectid=220fddbe32a68e1697d41324940e09b6
  >>>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>> --
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>> <image.tiff>
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>
  >>>>>
  >>>>> =
  >>>>> Foreclosures - Save 50%
  >>>>> Search foreclosure listings in your area. Find homes from

$10k.

  >>>>> http://a8-asy.a8ww.net/a8-ads/
  >>> adftrclick?redirectid=f007a027948d0da4ce48461b869a6d80
  >>>>>
  >>>>>
  >>>>>
  >>>>>
  >>>>>
  >>>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
  >>>>
  >>>>>
  >>>>
  >>>>
  >>>> =
  >>>> Pet Care Tips and Health
  >>>> Pet Tips- one of source for pet care information & pet

health.