thanks for clearing that up. Most convincing is the equal justice arguement for immigration. The social security arguement does not cut it for me aas that is equal justice to plunder.
I was never comfortable making the arguement, but thought it needed to be made. Someday the american public will demand that equal justice be done. Just uncomfortably pointing out the potential pitfulls of having it done by the courts.
As for Paul on this issue, no one is perfect.He sucks on immigtration and gays. You have helped to dampen my enthusiasm for the good Doctor. Uncomfortably, I bring up the cliche" the perfect crowding the good"