Thanks for the Help at our Booth at Pride

Hi All! Just want to say a heartfelt "Thanks" to those who helped out at our booth this past week-end:

Marcy--not easy to please, but she's always there to help out both days, and very resourceful at getting our booth to look appealing and neat. Very handy with rigging up posters and other odd jobs, as needed. Thanks, Marcy, I couldn't do it without you!

Dan The Man--even though it's not his political party, thanks to Dan from Campaign for Liberty for showing up in the person (and not just "in spirit") both days to help with the throngs of quiz takers and for staying through the tear-down both days. You're a real Mench!

Starchild--showed up both days (late as always) with outrageous attire (as always) with buttons, stickers, and the donation jar. Thanks for your interesting and inventive additions to our booth--your presence does not allow anyone to say the Libertarians are stuffy and boring!

Jawj--thanks for showing up unexpectedly on Sunday to help out. We haven't seen you for a while--please join us more often again!

Penny--despite a cold, she schlepped out from the East Bay to brave the crowds to help out on Sunday. Thanks for joining us, Penny, and please come to our monthly meetings on the second Saturday of each month!

Also, thanks to Mike Acree, Jim Elwood, and Jeff (from the East Bay) for stopping by our booth to say hi. We gave out tons of Mike's pink pamphlet, which highlights many Libertarian ideas which would not reach the masses otherwise.

While there is no way to measure what "good" we accomplish at such an event, I always receive a few "Thank you for being here" comments at each Pride, which tells me it's affirmation for those with Libertarian leanings. We might not convert them, but I think we often get the wheels turning.

Thanks!
Aubrey

Good job all of you....thank you so much for being there.

Mike

Of course the biggest thank you from the LPSF should go to Aubrey for making the booth reservations, shopping for the new tent and a lot of the booth supplies, bringing all that stuff and carrying back all that stuff, and staffing the booth for two solid days.

It does do good to have a booth at Pride, since libertarianism needs all the exposure it can get. Pride is a huge event, and we get to introduce libertarian principles to tons of folks!

Marcy

Hear, hear! Aubrey, thanks for all your work on this. Your dedication is really appreciated. And I'll second your kudos for everyone else who helped.

  Can we put an item on the agenda for our next meeting regarding what other events to do this summer, and specifically what can we do as far as something "outside the box" that will get us attention and publicity?

Love & Liberty,
                                  ((( starchild )))

Should we be looking for things to do to continue our outreach activities, we might consider attending meetings discussing the "Smart Cities" program that San Francisco has signed on to. I have a feeling this is one of those programs that creep into our lives, and one day we wake up to their results, and say "What happened?" SPUR is having a series of meetings on this subject, dealing with plans to move away from single-family homes, personal automobiles, traveling distances to work. BTW, all worthwhile projects, unless they are brought about by force.

Marcy

Marcy,

  Sounds good to me. But I just checked SPUR's website, and the only "smart cities" event they had scheduled says it has been cancelled and they plan to reschedule it ( http://www.spur.org/events ). Do you know whether this is different from Agenda 21, or part of the same effort?

Love & Liberty,
                                ((( starchild )))

Here's another outreach idea -- we could do our own events on the steps of City Hall.

  I was down there today for a rally for Ross Mirkarimi, the embattled sheriff trying to hold onto his job in the face of Ethics Commission hearings based on his conviction on a charge that never should have been brought, because the alleged victim, his wife, did not wish to press charges. I had hoped they would have a sound system and speakers and that I'd be able to speak, but it turned out to be only around 15 people or so, mostly holding signs, with a little bit of chanting.

  After I was there a few minutes however, sheriff's deputies came out of the building and told us we couldn't be on the building steps and would have to go down to the sidewalk because we didn't have a permit. I asked if they could get us a permit, and they referred me to Room 8. Although I was not expecting success, I thought I would go down there (it's in the basement on the Polk Street side of the building, just downstairs from where we were) and ask for one.

  When I entered the office and told the two guys there I wanted a permit to demonstrate on the steps of City Hall, the one in charge asked me when it was for, and I said "right now". He verified there was nothing else scheduled, and then got on a walkie-talkie (I know cell phone reception in the building can be bad, but I wonder how much the taxpayers paid for those) and told somebody he had someone in his office requesting a permit for now. The person he was talking to sounded like he said he didn't have time to do it, but I said we didn't need anything from them other than the permit. He'd already given me the form and it was a simple one-page document with an accompanying page of rules, all they needed to do was sign it. In any case, he eventually said someone else was coming over and would be there shortly, which turned out to be their media manager, Rohan Lane. He was very friendly and cooperative, and signed the permit right away, asking if there was anything else they could do. I said they could get rid of the permit requirement altogether, as it was unnecessary. He said it was basically just in case different groups wanted to use the space at the same time. I noted that it did seem to have gotten better, that they used to require people to be sponsored by a Supervisor in order to have events on the steps -- which is in fact what I'd expected them to tell me when I went down there. He said they had streamlined the process, and I said that was good, and asked who deserved the credit, and he said he himself was actually responsible, so I told him thank you.

  Anyway, this is very good news for us. The steps of City Hall are a great place to do rallies and press conferences and such, and without needing a supervisor's involvement, we could easily get a permit and do this. We can even use a megaphone without an additional permit. The time slots can be up to two hours. Weekdays (mornings or early afternoons) are probably best in terms of foot traffic at the building, but if that doesn't work for people we could do weekends. I was thinking perhaps we could simply take turns on my megaphone reading the text of some various articles on government outrages to everyone within earshot. We could also invite guest speakers or what-not.

  By the way, the Ethics Commission apparently met for about five hours last night, and most of the day today, before adjourning until their next hearing on July 18. Ross Mirkarimi himself came out to thank his supporters, and told us that was the next date. I was surprised it was going to take that long, but he seemed to feel it was okay; I guess maybe there are witnesses to call and such. Someone who'd been watching the hearing said that Mayor Ed Lee testified earlier, and then there had been a break in the proceedings because someone phoned in a threat or something. The Mirkarimi supporter who related this speculated that it was a pretext to interrupt the mayor's testimony because he was making himself look bad. I don't know, but there didn't seem to be any general evacuation of the building or anything. This woman told us that Ed Lee appeared to have been caught in a lie (who would have imagined!), saying he didn't talk to any Supervisors about something, when Christine Olague was heard saying she had talked to him. Reportedly she subsequently reversed herself and said she had not.

  I did watch part of the hearing yesterday evening, but only on TV in the north light court downstairs, because they said the hearing room was full and they weren't letting anyone in. This was annoying, as they could have easily used a larger room, or accommodated more people. There were even a couple empty seats visible behind the attorneys as they spoke on TV. Everyone in the overflow area -- perhaps 30 people -- appeared to be a Mirkarimi supporter, or if they weren't they kept quiet. People had signs, stickers, and buttons, and a petition which I signed in support of the sheriff. There was also at least one reporter who hadn't been able to get into the hearing room either. What I saw of the hearing itself was mainly a bunch of back and forth over minutiae of what evidence was to be allowed and such. It wasn't really possible to tell for sure how the commissioners really felt on the matter at hand from their comments -- the chair, an Asian man whose name I didn't catch, seemed to be trying to exclude material potentially harmful to Mirkarimi, but it's always possible he plans to vote against him and just wants to cover himself in order to look fair. As I understand it, the Ethics Commission won't actually do anything other than issuing a recommendation to the Board of Supervisors (apparently not until July 18 or later).

  Ross recognized me, by the way, and seemed genuinely grateful that I was there (I'm not exactly part of his base, and he may have been pleasantly surprised), but he said something like "libertarian would understand". He seemed fairly relaxed and upbeat.

Love & Liberty,
                                 ((( starchild )))

Mike,

  I didn't mean to imply I was surprised that he knew who I was or who we are, but you'll have to refresh my memory with regard to the Skateboard Task Force. Are you sure you aren't thinking about Tom Ammiano? I believe he was the supervisor at the time who nominated the individual who got appointed in my stead. But I know Mirkarimi has been bad on many issues, even some issues on which you'd think he would have been better (he supported imposing a limit on the number of head shops in the Haight-Ashbury!). He also abandoned the Green Party to become a Democrat, which lowered my respect for him. That stuff notwithstanding, I still consider it good politics to support him being reinstated as sheriff, because I'm sure whoever else they're likely to come up with to fill the post will not be as pro-civil liberties.

Love & Liberty,
                               ((( starchild )))

Since we meet every month at the library right near City Hall, we could try to get permits to demonstrate on the steps of City Hall for an hour or two before our meetings on those days. Then we could easily walk over to the library after we finish our manifestation*. If while in front of City Hall we find anybody interested in what we have to say, invite them to come over to the meeting and social directly.

  We could further advertise that on certain dates, the manifestations will focus on certain topics -- taxes, cannabis, jobs, prostitution, transit, the Patrol Specials, the "War on Drugs", inflation & monetary policy, the Nolan Chart, etc. Besides our hardcore group, the people who came because they saw the notices online, or on fliers, would presumably be people with some interest in that particular topic. Then if we had guests, we could dedicate part of the meeting following the manifestation to discussing the libertarian approach to that topic. Another possibility would be publicly reading letters to the editor we'd written during the month, or inviting special libertarian guests.

  Anybody else like the idea?

Love & Liberty,
                                 ((( starchild )))

*A term for "demonstration", "rally", or "protest" used in Europe; I love this term, because it suggests that a demonstration or rally is merely a surface *manifestations* or reflection of a deeper and broader discontent among the people.

Good outreach idea, but not one I would personally participate in. I would prefer to attend City Hall or other downtown meetings, and if possible speak the libertarian point of view. I agree that demonstrating on second Saturdays would be a lot better than what I am doing now, which is pretty much nothing! But I just would prefer to work inside the "system.".

Marcy

Marcy,

  I respect your intellectual integrity in appreciating the idea even if it isn't something you'd do yourself. However "the system" does allow us to peacefully protest, you know. If we were doing it without permits in defiance of local authorities, that might be more readily considered "outside the system", although even then I would argue it was authorized under the Constitution, which is supposedly the cornerstone of "the system" in this country.

Love & Liberty,
                                   ((( starchild )))

Hi Starchild,

Sorry for not expressing myself very clearly. Yes, peaceful assembly/demonstrations are indeed totally constitutional, and something I support without question. However, the way I see it, the constitutional framework allows for activity inside the political system (town hall meetings, speaking with your district representatives, running for office), and activities outside the political system(demonstrations). Since we are a political party, I personally prefer the former.

My expressing my preference is not meant to discourage demonstrations, in front of City Hall or wherever, if that is what some members of this list prefer to do. Maybe some of us could pledge to to some demonstrations, others to attend meetings, others to do tablings, etc.

Marcy

Hi Starchild and Marcy! I'm pretty much game for anything and everything that spells activism, even some light civil disobedience. The main thing is that we need a certain number of folks to show up--one or two folks demonstrating will make us look pretty silly. I'll put this topic on next Saturday's agenda and we can discuss it some more.

Thanks!
Aubrey