Starchild - Court Update (Part II) - Police Report

I meant to post this sooner, but it took a while to get around to typing it all up. This may be the only time you'll ever see a police report posted on the Internet by the defendant in a criminal case, so I hope you feel special! 8) But I feel that I have little or nothing to lose by doing it. Perhaps it may lead to some good ideas or suggestions from the vast online conspiracy of sympathetic people potentially willing to help me beat this B.S. If nothing else, I think it's important for ordinary citizens to know as much as possible about how the police operate, and this sort of thing is usually hidden from public view.

  Some notes about the document: Mainly it consists of two pairs of largely overlapping accounts by two different officers who were involved in my arrest -- first a "summary narrative" and a "narrative" by the officer in charge of the operation, and then a similar pair of reports by the main undercover female officer. It's kind of odd that they bother with "summary narratives" since they are almost the same as the full narratives. But of course this is typical of how bureaucracies work -- when things are normally done a certain way, you keep doing them that way even when it doesn't really make any sense.

  There are a few things I've left out. I've excluded all the officers' names here because I'm not sure I'm legally allowed to disclose them. (When I got the report from the D.A.'s office I had to sign a release form, but they conveniently didn't give me a copy of it and I don't remember exactly what it said.) I've also left out my birth name where it occurs because I don't use it any more; if I'd wanted to keep using it, I wouldn't have had it changed. They had no reason to include it either, and the only reason I can see for it appearing over and over is their obvious cultural prejudice against the name "Starchild."

  I've also added a few things in brackets -- explanatory notes, observations on what they got wrong, "sic" where there is a misspelling, etc.

FIRST REPORT (Summary Narrative by officer in charge)

Starchild:I wonder how thesmokinggun.com is able to obtain and post
all that content, including police reports and mug shots.

I don't know anything about it. I'll have to check that site out. I guess it just goes to show you should never underestimate the Internet!

Yours in liberty,
        <<< starchild >>>

Starchild:I wonder how thesmokinggun.com is able to obtain and post
all that content, including police reports and mug shots.

> I meant to post this sooner, but it took a while to get around to
> typing it all up. This may be the only time you'll ever see a police
> report posted on the Internet by the defendant in a criminal case, so I
> hope you feel special! 8) But I feel that I have little or nothing
> to lose by doing it. Perhaps it may lead to some good ideas or
> suggestions from the vast online conspiracy of sympathetic people
> potentially willing to help me beat this B.S. If nothing else, I think
> it's important for ordinary citizens to know as much as possible about
> how the police operate, and this sort of thing is usually hidden from
> public view.
>
> Some notes about the document: Mainly it consists of two pairs of
> largely overlapping accounts by two different officers who were
> involved in my arrest -- first a "summary narrative" and a "narrative"
> by the officer in charge of the operation, and then a similar pair of
> reports by the main undercover female officer. It's kind of odd that
> they bother with "summary narratives" since they are almost the same as
> the full narratives. But of course this is typical of how bureaucracies
> work -- when things are normally done a certain way, you keep doing
> them that way even when it doesn't really make any sense.
>
> There are a few things I've left out. I've excluded all the officers'
> names here because I'm not sure I'm legally allowed to disclose them.
> (When I got the report from the D.A.'s office I had to sign a release
> form, but they conveniently didn't give me a copy of it and I don't
> remember exactly what it said.) I've also left out my birth name where
> it occurs because I don't use it any more; if I'd wanted to keep using
> it, I wouldn't have had it changed. They had no reason to include it
> either, and the only reason I can see for it appearing over and over is
> their obvious cultural prejudice against the name "Starchild."
>
> I've also added a few things in brackets -- explanatory notes,
> observations on what they got wrong, "sic" where there is a
> misspelling, etc.
>
> FIRST REPORT (Summary Narrative by officer in charge)
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------------------------------
> Due to prostitution activity being advertised over different web sites
> on the Internet [where else would a web site be?] for the Tri City area
> an undercover sting operation was set up.
>
> Room 246 at the Garden Court Inn was acquired for in [sic] operation.
> Ofc ___ and Ofc ___, working in an undercover capacity, were assigned
> to call an ad on one of the web sites advertising a male named "Chris"
> as a "BOYFRIEND EXPERIENCE." [This phrase was not capitalized in my
> ad.] Refer to the attached copy of the ad.
>
> When "Chris" arrived he agreed to "FUCK" (have sexual intercourse) with
> Ofc ___ and Ofc ___ for $150.00 and $100.00 for each hour after that.
> Ofc ___ placed the money on the table and stated "Chris" told her they
> could discuss more about the money when the time was up.
>
> "Chris" had been advertising in the Fremont area [that's a bit
> misleading -- the only way I was "advertising in the Fremont area" is
> that the word "Fremont" appeared in a long list of Bay Area cities
> listed as keywords in my ad] but lived in San Francisco and took BART
> to Fremont to meet Ofc ___ at the Garden Court Inn.
>
> Ofc ___ called the arrest signal and the officers on the perimeter made
> entry and detained "Chris".
>
> "Chris" was identified as [my former legal name, both first and last
> misspelled] with a date of birth of [here they got it right]. [my
> former name] stated he had legally changed his name to "Starchild"
> [which they knew perfectly well was true since it was on my driver's
> license which they looked at] and was quit [sic] adamant about being
> called "Starchild."
>
> I advised "Starchild" [notice how my *actual legal name* is in quotes]
> of the Miranda Warning which he stated he understood but when asked if
> he wanted to give a statement "Starchild" said, "No!".
>
> "Starchild" was transported to the Fremont Jail where he was booked for
> the solicitation of prostitution - PC647b.
>
> I recommend this summary be used for charging purposes.
>
> I recommend a copy of this report be sent to the DDA and a complaint be
> issued charging [former legal name] (Starchild) with the solicitation
> of prostitution - PC647(b).
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------------------------------
>
> FIRST REPORT (Narrative by officer in charge)
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------------------------------
> Due to complaints of prostitution activity being advertised on
> different web sites for the Tri City area an undercover sting operation
> was set up. [Interesting difference from the summary in that
> "complaints" are mentioned here. I wonder who if anyone actually
> complained.]
>
> Ofc ___ and Ofc ___, working in an undercover capacity, were directed
> to called [sic] a web site [how do you call a web site?] where a male
> named "Chris" was advertising a "BOYFRIEND EXPERIENCE". Refer to the
> attached copy of the ad.
>
> Room 246 at the Garden Court Inn was acquired for the undercover
> operation. Ofc ___ was to call "Chris" and have him meet her and Ofc
> ___ in room 246 where they would attempt to get "Chris" to solicit them
> for some type of sexual act for money. If this should occur the arrest
> signal would be given and the officers on the perimeter would enter the
> room and detain "Chris".
>
> I supplied Ofc ___ with recorded funds and an undercover transmitter
> that had the capability of transmitting sounds and conversation. I had
> in my possession an undercover receiver that had the capability of
> receiving and recording sounds and conversation from the transmitter
> Ofc ___ had in her possession.
>
> "Chris" lived in San Francisco but was advertising for the Fremont
> area. "Chris" took BART to the Fremont station and called Ofc ___ when
> he got into Fremont. "Chris" wanted Ofc ___ to pick him up [she told me
> they were out at a bar, so I gave them the option of meeting me at
> BART] but she told him she had been drinking and didn't want to drive.
> "Chris" advised Ofc ___ there would be an additional charge if he took
> a taxi [this was actually discussed in advance] and Ofc ___ agreed to
> this.
>
> "Chris" arrived at room 246 at approximately 2205 hrs where he met Ofc
> ___ and Ofc ___. "Chris" was in the room for approximately 15 minutes
> when Ofc ___ called the arrest signal. [I think it was more like 5-10
> minutes, but there's a chance he could be correct]
>
> The officers on the perimeter of the room made entry and "Chris" was
> detained.
>
> I debriefed Ofc ___ and Ofc ___ and was told "Chris" offered to "FUCK"
> both of them for $150.00 and if he stayed longer it would be $100.00
> after that. Ofc ___ stated she had placed $300.00 of the recorded funds
> I had given her on the table and was told by "Chris" they could discuss
> total payment when he left.
>
> "Chris" was identified as [former legal name] but I was informed by him
> he had changed his name legally to "Starchild".
>
> I advised "Starchild" of the Miranda Warning which he stated he
> understood but when asked if he wanted to give a statement he said,
> "No". [for some reason an exclamation point was added here in the
> summary narrative]
>
> A search of "Starchild's" back pack revealed 33 wrapped condoms that
> were taken and placed into evidence.
>
> "Starchild" was transported to the Fremont Jail where he was booked for
> the solicitation of prostitution - PC647b.
>
> No further police action was taken. [Not quite true -- a Fremont police
> officer drove me to Santa Rita the next day]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------------------------------
>
> SECOND REPORT (Summary Narrative by main female undercover officer)
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------------------------------
> On December 6, 2005, I met in the Investigations Briefing room at
> approximately 1200 hours to assist Officer ___ on a "Soliciting for
> Prostitution Sting" in an undercover and cover officer capacity. My
> task was to be solicited for sexual acts in exchange for money by a
> male escort. [Yeah, right, as if *I* was the one soliciting *her* and
> she had no active role!]
>
> We then responded to the Best Western Garden Court Inn located on Mowry
> Ave in Fremont and Officer ___ provided me with a copy of an adult
> escort advertisement he found on the Internet. The ad I was given was
> of a male by the name of "Chris". [This account is interesting because
> it makes it sound like it was an all day operation by several officers
> aimed solely at arresting me.] The ad also listed a contact phone
> number (415-270-7887). The ad contained 3 pictures of a white male who
> was barely clothed. [That's kind of an amusing description because one
> shot is just a headshot so you can't really tell beyond the fact that
> I'm not wearing a shirt, while the second shot I'm not wearing
> anything, but have a cowboy hat strategically placed between my legs]
>
> I called the number listed on the ad. The phone went directly to a
> voicemail message instructing me to leave my contact information and
> when I would like to get together with him. A male called back several
> minutes later and identified himself as "Chris". He said he was
> available tonight, and agreed to meet me at my hotel room. We agreed to
> meet at approximately 2000 hours. [Normally I would be embarrassed to
> not be able to get there until two hours later (my driver was
> thankfully unavailable), but in this case I'm glad to have kept them
> waiting!] He quoted me a price of $150.00 for an hour of his time.
> Prior to Chris's arrival, Officer ___ gave me a total of $300.00 cash.
>
> Chris called when he arrived at the Fremont BART station and said he
> would meet me at the hotel room. Chris called me when he arrived at the
> hotel and I let him in the outer hotel building door. I escorted him
> [nice choice of words] to my hotel room where Officer ___ was waiting
> for us, also as an undercover officer.
>
> Once we were in the room, I asked him more intensively what we would do
> while we were there. He said he would do anything within his limits. He
> said he usually starts with a massage and then it can lead up to a
> "fuck" if we wanted. I then told him that the money was on the table
> and I pointed to the three $100.00 bills on the desk in the hotel room.
> He said we could deal with the money at the end.
>
> I then asked Chris again how much it would be if we both did "fuck"
> (meaning myself and Officer ___). He said it was the same price as long
> as it was in the hour. He then said it would be $100.00 for each
> additional hour.
>
> I soon gave the arrest signal. A few moments later, the arrest team
> opened the door to the room. Officer ___ took over the investigation at
> that point. Chris was later identified as "[former legal name]". He was
> subsequently placed under arrest for 647(b) PC and transported to the
> FPD jail for booking.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------------------------------
>
> SECOND REPORT (Narrative by main female undercover officer)
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------------------------------
> On December 6, 2005, I met in the Investigations Briefing room at
> approximately 1200 hours to assist Officer ___ on a "Soliciting for
> Prostitution Sting" in an undercover and cover officer capacity. My
> task was to be solicited for sexual acts in exchange for money by a
> male escort.
>
> The other officers involved in this operation were [names of 6 officers
> here]. During the briefing, we agreed on a predetermined arrest signal,
> if in fact we were solicited.
>
> We all then responded to the Best Western Garden Court Inn located at
> 5400 Mowry Ave in Fremont.
>
> Officer ___ provided me with a copy of an adult escort advertisement he
> found on the Internet. The ad I was given was of a male by the name of
> "Chris". The ad also listed a contact phone number (415-270-7887). The
> ad contained 3 pictures of a white male who was barely clothed. See the
> ad attached to Officer ___'s report for details.
>
> I called the number listed on the ad. The phone went directly to a
> voicemail message instructing me to leave my contact information and
> when I would like to get together with him. A male called back several
> minutes later and identified himself as "Chris". He said he was
> available tonight, and agreed to meet me at my hotel room. We agreed to
> meet at approximately 2000 hours. He quoted me a price of $150.00 for
> an hour of his time. Prior to Chris's arrival, Officer ___ gave me a
> total of $300.00 cash. I was to use this money during the transaction.
>
> "Chris" and I spoke several times during the day. One time he said he
> would be approximately one hour late because he had to take BART from
> San Francisco. At approximately 1930 hours, I spoke with Chris where he
> said he would meet me at the hotel room at approximately 2100 hours. At
> this time I told him I was in room #249. [This is a different room
> number than that given in the other officer's report; did they
> "acquire" more than one room, or is this another mistake?]
>
> Chris called when he arrived at the Fremont BART station and said he
> would meet me at the hotel room. Chris called me when he arrived at the
> hotel and I let him in the outer hotel building door. I escorted him to
> my hotel room where Officer ___ was waiting for us, also as an
> undercover officer.
>
> Once we were in the room, I asked him more intensively what we would do
> while we were there. He said he would do anything within his limits. He
> said he usually starts with a massage and then it can lead up to a
> "fuck" if we wanted. I then told him that the money was on the table
> and I pointed to the three $100.00 bills on the desk in the hotel room.
> He said we could deal with the money at the end.
>
> I then asked Chris again how much it would be if we both did "fuck"
> (meaning myself and Officer ___). He said it was the same price as long
> as it was in the hour. He then said it would be $100.00 for each
> additional hour.
>
> I soon uttered the arrest signal. A few moments later, the arrest team
> opened the door to the room. Officer ___ took over the investigation at
> that point. Chris was later identified as "[former legal name]". He was
> subsequently placed under arrest for 647(b) PC and transported to the
> FPD jail for booking. No further action taken by this officer.
>
> A backpack was taken from him at the jail [actually I did not have
> possession of it after leaving the hotel room] and booked into property
> at the Fremont Police Department for safekeeping. A property receipt
> was issued to [former legal name] at the jail.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------------------------------
>
> These narratives comprise the bulk of the report, but there are also a
> few other things in it as well. There are a couple forms with various
> information entered, on which they get a couple details wrong:
>
> - My date of birth is listed as 1973 (actually it's 1970)
> - My eye color is listed as blue (actually it's brown)
>
> One of the forms lists three pieces of evidence in custody:
>
> 1. wrapped condoms
> 2. cassette tape of Miranda Warning
> 3. u/c [presumably undercover] tape
>
> Under "assignment" on one of the forms it says "Noon Day Shift, B
> Team, Zone 1." Under "nature of call" it says "Disorderly
> conduct/solicit prostitution."
>
> Also included in the police report is a copy of my Craigslist ad that
> they used to contact me with photos (ad text is at bottom of this
> email, but I've left the photos out because some of you may be
> receiving this at work or what-not), and a photocopy of the currency
> they were using, showing the serial numbers of the bills. Asterisks are
> marked next to the images of three of the $100 bills, and there is a
> note in the margin reading "$300.00 taken from table in room 246." It's
> a little unclear to me why they would make a note of this in the
> report, as I never touched the money and they don't claim that I did.
>
> All in all, there are no real surprises here for better or worse. They
> were sloppy in preparing the report, but don't seem to have
> deliberately lied about anything.
>
> My next hearing, described as the "pretrial conference" is Thursday
> (tomorrow) at the usual time and place -- 9:00 a.m. in the Fremont
> Municipal Court at 39439 Paseo Padre Parkway, on the 2nd floor in
> Department 602. I don't expect much to happen, because I plan to tell
> them that I have found an attorney I am planning to retain, but she
> cannot be there tomorrow, so in all likelihood they will just assign a
> new date for this to take place and that will be the end of it until
> next time. Therefore I'd say there's no particular need for anyone to
> bother to show up, unless you really have nothing better to do or want
> to have lunch with me at Sweet Tomato afterwards.
>
> Meanwhile however, any suggestions for my defense, or helpful analysis
> of what's in the police report, is welcome.
>
> Fight the power!
> <<< starchild >>>
> (aka Chris Fox)
>
> THE CRAIGSLIST AD [formatting approximated]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------------------------------
> (((((((( Boyfriend Experience )))))))) - m4w m4m
> __________________________________________
> Reply to: pers-16099248@...
> Date: 2005-12-05, 8:14PM PST
>
> (Scroll all the way down after reading to see my photos)...
>
> Do you want a real, romantic experience and not just a cold, soulless
> encounter? Me too!
>
> I'm an adult video star who is sweet, affectionate, healthy and sexy,
> with a hot body from lots of time in the gym. Beautifully proportioned
> 45" chest, 30" waist, 15" biceps, thick hard 8" by 6.5" cock, and long
> brown/blonde-streaked hair.
>
> I'm very sensual, and love giving deep, full-body massages, showing off
> for muscle worshippers, kissing, giving and receiving oral pleasure,
> making passionate love (I'm a top), and just snuggling in bed. I
> appreciate atmosphere, and like to bring wine, candles and incense for
> a romantic, erotic date.
>
> Turning other people on turns me on, so I would love to see you no
> matter what your age (Uncle Sam insists that you be over 18 of
> course!), body type, race, gender or level of experience. I am
> 420-friendly, and couples and party scenes are OK too. Just be horny,
> friendly, and honest and we'll have fun!
>
> Quality intimate time in downtown or central San Francisco is $150 for
> the first hour and $100 per additional hour. Overnight is $500. Going
> out on the town (dinner, theater, etc.) is $50 per hour, but I will
> often waive part or all of this fee as part of a longer date.
>
> Live outside central SF? I'll come to you for my normal rate plus the
> cost of transportation and a small fee for my travel time. I'm also
> available as a domestic or international travel companion.
>
> If you have a favorite fetish or fantasy, or there's anything you're
> wondering about, please feel free to ask. This is a real full service
> with fair rates, and I'm not out to hustle or deceive anyone in any way.
>
> Thanks for checking me out, and I look forward to meeting you! Email is
> OK, phone is better. Call me any time -- 4_1_5 - 2_7_0 - 7_8_8_7.
>
> xoxoxo
>
> Chris
>
> This is in or around SF, or will go to other Bay Area locations for
> extra donation
>
> Keywords: m4m, m4w, m4mw, m4t, campbell cupertino gilroy, south county
> los gatos milpitas mountain view san jose downtown san jose east san
> jose north san jose south san jose west santa clara santa cruz saratoga
> sunnyvale willow glen, cambrian alameda albany / el cerrito berkeley
> berkeley north / hills berkeley west concord / pleasant hill / martinez
> danville / san ramon dublin / pleasanton / livermore emeryville fremont
> / union city hayward / castro valley hercules, pinole, san pablo, el
> sob lafayette / orinda / moraga oakland downtown oakland east oakland
> hills / mills oakland lake merritt / grand oakland north / temescal
> oakland piedmont / montclair oakland west pittsburg / antioch richmond
> / point / annex rockridge / claremont san leandro vallejo / benicia /
> fairfield walnut creek atherton belmont brisbane burlingame coastside
> daly city east palo alto foster city los altos menlo park millbrae
> mountain view pacifica palo alto redwood city redwood shores san bruno
> san carlos san mateo south san francisco corte madera fairfax greenbrae
> kentfield larkspur mill valley napa novato petaluma san anselmo san
> rafael santa rosa sausalito sebastopol sonoma stinson, bolinas tiburon
> bayview bernal heights castro / upper market cole valley / ashbury hts
> downtown / civic / van ness excelsior / outer mission financial
> district glen park haight ashbury hayes valley ingleside / SFSU / CCSF
> inner richmond inner sunset / UCSF laurel hts / presidio lower haight
> lower nob hill lower pac hts marina / cow hollow mission district nob
> hill noe valley north beach / telegraph hill pacific heights potrero
> hill richmond / seacliff russian hill SOMA / south beach sunset /
> parkside twin peaks /diamond hts USF / panhandle west portal / forest
> hill western addition SPECIAL NOTE: If you live in BELMONT, please call
> your local representatives and ask them to tell the Belmont Police to
> stop wasting taxpayer money harassing escorts and their clients for
> private acts between consenting adults!
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>

SPONSORED LINKS

<image.tiff>

<image.tiff>

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

+ Visit your group "lpsf-discuss" on the web.

+ To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
lpsf-discuss-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

+ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

<image.tiff>

I bet if you tried (and wanted the publicity) you could get them to
post your case. However, there is a big risk that they would mock you.
So if you don't mind seeing something like "starchild - california
gigolo", you might give it a try.