Brian, That this was written by Paul gets a 10 on the BS meter. The biggest tipoff that this is 21 st century forgery is the word "black terrorist" down in the Reginald Denny section. That is not an expression that would likely be used in 1992.The site you offer is a Holocaust publicity site that may have Zionist sympathies. Can it be possible that pro Israel activists would perceive Dr. Paul's non interventionist stance in a negative light?
Eric, Are you espousing the initiation of violence?
"black terrorist" down in the Reginald Denny section. That is not an
expression that would likely be used in 1992.
Sorry, Phil, but you're simply wrong. The phrase "black terrorist"
was indeed used under Ron Paul's byline in that 1992 newsletter. He
even admits it in the NYT Magazine article. But his defense is that
the article was ghost written by someone working for him, and that he
doesn't agree with those sentiments.
If you're going to defend Ron Paul, please don't do it by claiming
that someone offering criticism is lying, when the candidate himself
admits the facts and instead finds some other way to weasel out of
(speaking on my own behalf and not Outright's)