Sheehan

Derek,

Stooge: One who allows oneself to be used for another's profit or advantage

By your definition, would not an employee of any company qualify as a stooge?

Best, Michael

Dear Dr. Mike and Derek;
   
  But what about the Three Stooges?? Won't they resent the implications about them as Stooges??? Or as they say South of the Border - Las Tres Stupidos!!!.
   
  Ron Getty
  SF Libertarian
   
  P.S. Derek - if it's not toooooo personal what's with your presumed fixation with Cindy Sheehan and what she says and does with anyone anywhere???

dredelstein@... wrote:
          Derek,
   
  > Stooge: One who allows oneself to be used for another's profit or advantage

  By your definition, would not an employee of any company qualify as a stooge?
   
  Best, Michael

Michael:

Using my definition strictly, then yes. However, I think a better
definition would imply an unwitting participant (one who does not
realize that they are being used)

For instance, I am used and abused every day and night by my firm, but
make this exchange willingly - I know what I signed up for and am
fully aware of the toll it is taking on my body and my sanity, but I'm
greedy so I do it.

I'm not sure Sheehan realizes the full extent to which she is being
used by the loony left.

-Derek

[ Attachment content not displayed ]

Dear Derek;

The actual definition of treason and traitor Constitutionally is:

Section 3. Treason against the United States, shall consist only in
levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving
them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless
on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on
confession in open court.

Ergo and therefore and ipsit fixit facto - Cindy is not guilty of
treason and traitor but is guilty of the First Amendment Right of
Freely speaking out no matter who don't like it.....

Ron Getty
SF Libertarian

--- In lpsf-discuss@yahoogroups.com, Derek Jensen <derekj72@g...>
wrote:

Ron:

I'm no more fixated on her than the "mainstream" media seems to

be. What I

really wish is that she would just go away.

We used to have a word for people that would protest against

America on

foreign soil, or give support to our enemies. Traitors.

-Derek

>
> Dear Dr. Mike and Derek;
>
> But what about the Three Stooges?? Won't they resent the

implications

> about them as Stooges??? Or as they say South of the Border -

Las Tres

> Stupidos!!!.
>
> Ron Getty
> SF Libertarian
>
> P.S. Derek - if it's not toooooo personal what's with your

presumed

> fixation with Cindy Sheehan and what she says and does with

anyone

> anywhere???
>
> *dredelstein@t…* wrote:
>
> Derek,
>
> > Stooge: One who allows oneself to be used for another's profit

or

> advantage
>
> By your definition, would not an employee of any company qualify

as a

> stooge?
>
> Best, Michael
>
> *To:* lpsf-discuss@yahoogroups.com
> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 24, 2006 11:42 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [lpsf-discuss] Sheehan
>
>
> Steve:
>
> Stooge: One who allows oneself to be used for another's profit or
> advantage
>
> So, no, we are not stooges of the LP. If and when the LP is
> sufficiently organized, it may progress to the level of having
> stooges. But not yet, as far as I can tell.
>
> -Derek
>
>
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Anyone still dispute that she's being used as a stooge by the

nutty

> left?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Tue Jan 24, 6:54 PM ET
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > CARACAS (AFP) - Anti-war protester Cindy Sheehan, mother of a

US

> >
> > soldier killed in
> >
> > Iraq, joined more than 10,000 anti-globalization activists in

Caracas,

> >
> > where she hailed Venezuela's leftist President Hugo Chavez.
> > Derek,
> >
> > Does supporting an idea make you a stooge to the group

associated with

> it?
> > If so, are we "stooges" of the LP?
> >
> > -- Steve
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> >
> >
> > Visit your group "lpsf-discuss" on the web.
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > lpsf-discuss-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of

Service.

> >
> > ________________________________
> >
>
>
> --
> View my blog at http://derekj72.blogspot.com
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>
> - Visit your group "lpsf-

discuss<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lpsf-discuss>"

> on the web.
>
> - To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> lpsf-discuss-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<lpsf-discuss-

unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

>
> - Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS
> U s government grant<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?

t=ms&k=U+s+government+grant&w1=U+s+government+grant&w2=Libertarian+pa
rty&w3=U+s+government+student+loan&w4=California+politics&c=4&s=107&.
sig=-TEWz9xDSTBwp7pUOuLHAA> Libertarian

> party<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?

t=ms&k=Libertarian+party&w1=U+s+government+grant&w2=Libertarian+party
&w3=U+s+government+student+loan&w4=California+politics&c=4&s=107&.sig
=GhiTfRFcmqxbzfuEtgS-Ow> U

> s government student loan<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?

t=ms&k=U+s+government+student+loan&w1=U+s+government+grant&w2=Liberta
rian+party&w3=U+s+government+student+loan&w4=California+politics&c=4&
s=107&.sig=at21uQxzQxCrqYBHvl-9-w> California

> politics<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?

t=ms&k=California+politics&w1=U+s+government+grant&w2=Libertarian+par
ty&w3=U+s+government+student+loan&w4=California+politics&c=4&s=107&.s
ig=XR3mel2ZuJZkr4i7oNUS-A>

> ------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>
> - Visit your group "lpsf-

discuss<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lpsf-discuss>"

> on the web.
>
> - To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> lpsf-discuss-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<lpsf-discuss-

unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

Ron:

The issue is not whether Cindy Sheehan has the right to speak but
rather whether her diatribes constitute an attack on her own country
and community in a time of war.

Derek,

Your modification of your original definition clarifies your meaning precisely.

BTW, I would be overjoyed to be a stooge of the left (or right) if it furnished me with the kind of platform Sheehan has, to broadcast the anti-war message.

Best, Michael

Fair point.