Romney "wins" the Denver presidential debates, but loses the election

Hello all,

I could imagine Republicans and conservatives regaling in Romney's "win"
during the Oct 3 first Presidential debate in Denver. But, while
defeating Obama is the "prime directive" we favor, replacing him with
Romney is hardly the libertarian ideal, especially since Romney will do
nothing to reduce the Government's involvement in our lives, nor will he
do anything to substantially or meaningfully reduce governmental
spending. Nor will he reduce regulations. Indeed, just like the
corporatist that he is (just like Obama), he declared he favors more
regulations to, not ostensibly, cripple competitors of corporations he
favors. (As usual, he, like Obama, wants to pick corporate winners and
losers with taxpayers' money. Can anyone tell me what's the real
difference between him and Obama?)

Still, however Republicans and conservatives are energized by what they
think is Romney's "first round knockout" of Obama in their first debate,
Obama will be re-elected, as the fix is in!

And if the fix is not enough, Obama will use "Plan B" to get
automatically re-elected. Here is how he will proceed:

A week before the election, when Obama sees his numbers not promising,
he sends his marching orders to his "special" supporters. These
"special" supporters include members of the old ACORN and ACORN-like
"community organizations"; the armed factions of the SEIU, UAW, NEA,
Teamsters and other labor unions; the New Black Panther Party; the
Nation of Islam; Obama's hitherto unknown private army; the leadership
of OWS and its legions of leftist malcontent losers and parasites. (This
is just a partial list.)

Under Obama's tutelage, these special supporters stage protests and
demonstrations throughout the land, which all "somehow" lead to riots,
race and otherwise. Obama then declares Martial Law throughout the land,
and postpones the elections. After a "suitable period," the riots die
down, though sporadic "pockets of resistance" still remain. And after
thousands are killed, uncounted are arrested and hundreds of billions of
dollars incurred in damages, Obama rescinds Martial Law and reschedules
the elections.

He then campaigns aggressively under his new campaign slogan, "Vote For

Landslide victory, here he comes.

You can't make these things up.

BTW, if you find "Plan B" implausible or hard to believe, then consider
this item:

"Obama to Stage 'Reichstag' Event as Trigger for Martial Law?"


The Obama agents, through the DHS and other assorted colluders, are
plotting a major `Reichstag' event to generate racial riots and produce
the justification for martial law, delaying the November 2012 elections,
possibly indefinitely, a DHS whistleblower informed the Canada Free
Press on Tuesday.

The `Reichstag Event' would take the form of a staged assassination
attempt against Barack Obama, "carefully choreographed" and manufactured
by Obama operatives. It would subsequently be blamed on "white
supremacists" and used to enrage the black community to rioting and
looting, the DHS source warned.

The Obama administration would then use the violence and chaos they
created as justification for the imposition of martial law in major
urban cities in America, the creation of DHS checkpoints, restriction of
travel, and the indefinite delay of the November 2012 elections.

The Reichstag event refers to a fire started during Hitler's rise to
power. The fire allowed him to grab emergency powers and murder his
opposition. Historians have long believed that Hitler started the fire
himself, while he blamed it on the Communists.



Kind of scary, huh?

So which do you think Obama will choose to stay in power? The "Reichstag
Event" or Plan B? My money is on Plan B, which the liberal mainstream
mass media will vigorously support.