What's it gonna take.
If nominated Marcy you got to serve!SMILE
Nahh, Eric. I will let Hillary serve her 8 years to pave my way.
Marcy
--- In lpsf-discuss@yahoogroups.com, "eric dupree"
<dupreeconsults@...> wrote:
What's it gonna take.
If nominated Marcy you got to serve!SMILE
> From: "Ron Getty" <tradergroupe@...>
> To: lpsf-discuss@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [lpsf-discuss] Request for LP support for Ron Paul
for President
> Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 14:35:37 -0800 (PST)
>
>
> Dear Wine Mike;
>
> Smith, Hess and Wayne Root - whom are dem guys? Any thumbnails on
> them? And why aren't there any Libertarian women Presidential
> candidates? Where's Marcy when we need her? Let's start a Marcy
for
> president band wagon.
>
> Ron Getty
> SF Libertarian
>
>
> From: Mike Denny <mike@...>
> To: lpsf-discuss@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 1:54:42 PM
> Subject: RE: [lpsf-discuss] Request for LP support for Ron Paul
for President
>
>
> There are four LP presidential candidates nowÂ…Kubby, Smith, Hess
> and Wayne Root.
>
> Mike
>
>
>
> From: lpsf-discuss@yahoogroups.com [mailto:
> lpsf-discuss@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Ron Getty
> Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 12:54 PM
> To: lpsf-discuss@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [lpsf-discuss] Request for LP support for Ron Paul
for President
>
> Dear Dr. Mike;
>
> Shouldn't this be addressed to the National Libertarian
Convention
> Delegates? Not knowing what the by-laws are at the national
level
> I can easily guess it does not include endorsing a candidate
> running as a Rebublican for Presdient.
>
> Perhaps Bryan can get the Libertarian National Delegates to
suspend
> the rules and endorse Ron Paul but I doubt very seriously this
> would or will or should happen. Afterall the Libertarian running
> for the Presdiential and Libertarian nomination is Steve Kubby.
> Maybe Bryan Morton is unaware of Steve Kubby.
>
> Ron Getty
> SF Libertarian
> From: "dredelstein@ threeminutethera py.com" <dredelstein@
> threeminutethera py.com>
> To: lpsf-discuss@ yahoogroups. com
> Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 10:03:03 AM
> Subject: [lpsf-discuss] Request for LP support for Ron Paul for
President
>
> From: Bryan Morton <bryandmorton@ bellsouth. net>
> Date: January 28, 2007 3:54:39 PM CST
> Subject: Request for LP support for Ron Paul for President.
>
> Please send this out to LP members and to your State and local
> LP affiliates.
>
> Dear Libertarian Party members,
>
> The members of the LP have a very important decision to
make.
> It is a decision which could, literally, change the future of
these
> United States and beyond. Making this decision will require an
> examination of priorities. As libertarians, what do Libertarian
> Party members desire most to accomplish through the electoral
> process? If our goal is greater liberty, how do we best achieve
> that end? Most libertarians understand the answer to that
question
> lies in educating individuals about the meaning of liberty and
what
> attitudes and actions are consistent or inconsistent with liberty.
>
> Libertarians have long used the Libertarian Party as a
vehicle
> to enter into public debates and other forums and be a voice for
> liberty where otherwise there would be none. To a large degree,
> winning elections to public office has been somewhat of a
secondary
> goal for Libertarian candidates. What was more important, was
> disseminating information and getting the ideas of liberty out
> where they could be reached by the masses. Obtaining office is
> also a win, for it allows us to prolong that educational period
and
> actually make positive changes to the system.
>
> Most people in these United States are stuck on party
labels.
> Many don't know how their governments work. Sadly many more
don't
> care. The share of the population which votes is a small
minority
> and most will simply vote the Party line that they always have.
> There are swing voters, but most of those swing from Republican
to
> Democrat with little thought of what lies between. For them, the
> priority has become less to do with specific ideologies and more
> about "our" team winning. Politics, for those who are loyal to
> their party, has become little more than another competition
where
> the only thing that matters, regardless of the consequences, is
> that "our" team wins. It's an unfortunate statement on the US
> people, but even more unfortunate is that we libertarians can
also
> get caught up in party labels. I believe libertarians to be of
> higher intelligence than most folks, and therefore are less
likely
> to get stuck in the rut of mindlessly rooting for a party label,
> rather than the individual or that individual's ideology.
>
> There is a strong possibility that Ron Paul will make a run
> for the Presidency in 2008. I don't think I have to enumerate to
> libertarians all the ways that having Ron Paul in the White House
> would be good. His record stands for itself. He has
consistently
> been the strongest advocate for liberty, limited government and
> peace to occupy a position in Washington , DC in any of our
> lifetimes, at least. I would highly recommend, for anyone
> unfamiliar with Dr. Paul, an internet search for "Ron Paul" and
> learn about the man and his beliefs. You will find some things
> with which you disagree. That's inevitable. However, take a
> measurement of how often he fearlessly defies the odds to speak
out
> and vote for libertarian ideals. Take a look at how his moral
and
> ethical compass consistently overrides the temptation to use his
> position for the benefit of his constituents at the cost of
others.
> He adheres to the Constitutional definition of his
Congressional
> job description
> and remains unbeholden to special interest groups. In fact,
> lobbyists don't even waste their time knocking on Ron Paul's
office
> door. They know there is no wealth or privilege to be bought
from
> "Dr. No." Ron Paul also consistently receives a greater
percentage
> of his election contributions from individuals than anyone else
in
> the beltway.
>
> Do I believe that getting Ron Paul elected President in 2008
> will be the magic bullet which miraculously ends Socialism and
> Imperialism in the US and brings forth an era of a libertarian
> Utopia? Unfortunately, no. However, I do believe that it would
be
> a giant leap forward in the education of many who have sadly been
> brainwashed to have faith in the theory of central government,
> corporatism, militarism and collectivism, and I can see a rolling
> back of many of the negative policies and consequences which we
> have allowed to have been imposed upon us.
>
> The Libertarian Party and it's members must choose their
> priorities. Do they want to root for the Libertarian label?
Which
> I'm sorry to say holds a slim chance for Presidential victory in
> the near future. Or do they move the libertarian philosophy onto
> center stage and elect a libertarian President regardless of the
> label he wears? It is most likely that Ron Paul will run on the
> Republican Party's ticket, but please look at the great
possibility
> that we have. This is a time when prudence calls for swallowing
a
> little party pride and letting the world see what is really
> important to libertarians.
>
> I humbly ask that the national LP not field a Presidential
> candidate in 2008 and instead publicly endorse and financially
> support Ron Paul for President. State and local LPs, we have the
> chance to make a real difference. This is a good start;http:/
> /www.manhattanlp .org/ . How many more are willing to put their
> voice behind someone who will and can fight for freedom at a time
> when it is so sorely needed? Put you support behind the man and
> the ideals for which he stands.
>
> Support Ron Paul for President in 2008.
>
> Thank you,
> Bryan Morton
> 3952 S. E. Coquina Dr .
> Stuart , FL 34997
> BryanDMorton@ bellsouth. net
>
> http://www.cafepres s.com/voteronpau l
>>
=
RainTube-keeps Gutters Flowing
A proven effective, uniquely designed, low-cost gutter system now
available nationwide. Charter contractor-installer certifications
available.
redirectid=fe24fc9b0e553942319d10a8c6c65f02