Jeffrey,
Thanks for your careful organization of the case for the existence
of a 9/11 conspiracy. Clearly you are an intelligent person and
genuinely motivated. Out of respect for that, I will take a look at
Folder A at my earliest opportunity, and get back to you. But I do
not expect to be convinced or much interested past that point.
Why? Because, if I understand the conspiracy theorists correctly,
the claim is being made that only a small number of conspirators are
involved, who somehow managed to manipulate the entire military,
government and media system on a grand scale, without the people
being affected realizing that they were being manipulated, and with
no solid linkages at all being uncovered back to the individual
conspirators during the entire five years the conspiracy has been
under scrutiny. This seems highly improbable to me.
On the other hand, Bin Laden says his guys did it. While I am
looking at Folder A, you might take a look at a book, _Messages to
the World_: The Statements of Bin Laden_, ed. Bruce Lawrence,
Verso, 2005, in statement 19, "Among a Band of Knights", p. 194,
where he says "our attacks" [on the WTC].
Anticipating a possible response, yes, it's true that Bin Laden was
once upon a time a recipient of CIA support in the mujahadin defense
against the Russian occupation in Afghanistan, and may himself be
one of the members of the 9/11 conspiracy.
Could be.
Regards,
Allen Rice
Michael,
One quote from Richard Rider I had to respond to.
He said we believe that "thousands of evil government" people
must have
perpetrated this crime. This is a great example of a critic of
9/11 Truth
putting his own words into our mouths.
Rider's statement is simply not true. Most experts in 9-11 truth
believe
the number who plotted it and knew the entire big picture could
have been a
much small number, as small a number as, perhaps, 19 or less (the
official
story had 19 people + OBL as the perpetrators).
Now there are logical reasons for thinking the number could be so
low, and
anyone who wants to skip ahead with the downloadable materials to
look at
Document 90c, and Audio 25a with its accompanying Transcript 25b,
both on
Folder C, will see some cogent, logical reasons why we think so
few could
have been the masterminds in the know and in control of the entire
plot.
But I am telling you, that if these types of issues you may have
which make
it difficult for you to imagine any degree of government
complicity actually
prevent you from looking at the evidence fairly presented by 9/11
Truth
experts, then you are refusing to look at the evidence due to
prejudice
about this case.
You have been told the official story over and over again since
9/11/01 by
the government and the mainstream media. You've seen the
government present
their "case" in the mainstream media, if you use the media, a
lot. Probably
most Americans were exposed to hundreds or even thousands of hours
of
propaganda over the last 5 years propping up the official
government myth.
But prejudice about the case, and having questions like these,
prevent many
people from taking two or three hours to re-examine the evidence
from the
other side.
Imagine of a grand jury presentment. A prosecutor typically will
go to a
grand jury and present all the evidence there is, seeking an
indictment.
What would happen if the foreman of the grand jury had previously
spent 5
years listening to the accused man's attorney tell him the
defense's side of
the story? He'd be disqualified because of not being able to see
the
evidence impartially and would have to recuse him/herself. But
let's just
say that we cannot disqualify the foreman because he's the only
person we've
got. Just like the US citizens are the only ones we've got to
present this
case to in a US jurisdiction. Well, imagine the first day of the
grand jury
convening, the very first minute of the proceedings, the
prosecutor rises to
begin presenting the evidence, and the foreman of the jury rises
and
interrupts the prosecutor before he can say a word. The foreman,
taking the
floor, says, "Listen, I've seen the bloody glove found at the
scene of the
crime, the man accused has hands that are too big to fit the
glove, and
since the glove don't fit, you must acquit. I refuse to listen to
any of
the evidence. The accused could not possibly have done the crime,
I want
the grand jury dismissed without looking at any of the evidence."
That is essentially what a lot of people are doing. They are
refusing to
look at the evidence that has been compiled by 911 Truth. They do
so
because of prejudices formed about the case because of five years
of hearing
the government's case and evidence over and over again.
The hardest part for many people is to actually get around to
looking at the
evidence. It is there in downloadable format and presented in a
sequential,
logical manner.
It is very hard for people to comprehend that the 9/11 Commission
was a
complete fraud and a coverup. It is hard to believe anything but
the
official story for many people. I know the feeling. I myself
believed most
of the official story for at least three years, until I found the
contrary
evidence and took a close look at it. It took me a while to learn
about and
analyze the evidence before I was convinced that we have been lied
to
massively about 9/11.
The only way to get your mind around the "over-the-top" events of
9/11 is to
look at the evidence from the other side, fairly presented. My
downloadable folders make it as easy as possible to do just that.
I know, it's not easy to believe that the government could be
telling
massive lies about 9/11, but if you look at the evidence, you will
see how
big a lie it is.
For all the doubters who are resistant to looking at the evidence,
I
challenge you to look at the evidence. Start with Folder A. It
only takes
an hour or less to go through. If after looking at the first hour
of
evidence, you are 100% sure the government is correct, God bless
you. I
hope that the issues brought up in Folder A will intrigue you
enough so that
you want to look at more of the evidence. In my opinion, this
real-life
story is more intriguing than any fictional movie, book, or crime
story.
The story is truly an amazing one historically, and the number of
dirty
facts about 9/11 that most people don't know are enormous.
The basic summary of our case is:
1. The government story is not only wildly implausible, it is
physically impossible on several counts.
2. The "9/11 Commission" was not an investigation, but a
complete sham
and a cover-up.
3. Most of the strong evidence 9/11 Truth has about this case is
unknown to the large majority of people and has been suppressed by
the all
the mainstream media.
4. Most people have not looked critically at all the evidence
9/11
Truth has which contradict the official government myth.
5. At the very least, we want people to look at the facts. We
think
the facts speak for themselves that 9/11 was not properly
investigated, and
there has been a massive coverup, and massive illegal destruction
of
evidence. We know that the government has confiscated and/or
never released
mountains of crucial evidence, and we want the government to bring
public
any evidence it has not already destroyed.
6. People need to understand the case that the War on Terror
and all
that has come with it has been based on a sacred myth propagated
by the
government which is based on a huge pack of lies of distortion and
omission.
7. Terror is a tool that has been used to manipulate the people
for
political purposes. If we close our eyes and stick our heads in
the sand
and refuse to look at this compelling evidence that has been
hidden from us
by the mainstream media, we are simply asking for more such deadly
terror
events in the future committed by the same network of perpetrators
in order
to manipulate the public. We must neutralize the political tool
of creating
terror, so as to protect us from falling further into a police
state.
I really think this issue is worth at least a couple of hours or
more of any