Sorry, I didn't mean to imply that Congressmembers wrote legislation
themselves; as we know, they rarely even read it. What we do know is
that it generally represents the moneyed interests, and that these
groups rarely perceive free trade as being in their interest. I think
Snyder's analysis, brought to us by Fields and Edelstein, supports that
assumption. CAFTA is much more important to me than NAFTA, however,
just because of the Codex provision. You dismiss that as a "narrow"
basis for objection, but it's my health. (There's a constituency-based
response for you.)