Oklahoma House Passes Bill to Ban UN Agenda 21

Discussion
1

Oklahoma House Passes Bill to Ban UN Agenda 21
Written by Alex Newman<http://thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/itemlist/user/68-alexnewman>

Following Alabama's lead<http://thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/11592-alabama-adopts-first-official-state-ban-on-un-agenda-21>, lawmakers in the Oklahoma House of Representatives voted overwhelmingly to approve popular legislation<http://webserver1.lsb.state.ok.us/cf_pdf/2013-14%20ENGR/hB/HB1412%20ENGR.PDF> protecting private-property rights and banning a controversial United Nations "sustainable development<http://thenewamerican.com/rio-20/item/12008-the-real-agenda-behind-un-“sustainability”-unmasked>" scheme known as Agenda 21<http://thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/6911-your-hometown--the-united-nations’-agenda-21>, which critics say represents a serious threat to American values and liberty. If approved by the Senate as expected, the law would also prohibit state and local governments from working with the UN or its affiliates to implement any sort of "international law" that violates the U.S. or Oklahoma constitutions.

The bill, H.B. 1412<http://webserver1.lsb.state.ok.us/cf_pdf/2013-14%20ENGR/hB/HB1412%20ENGR.PDF>, was passed in the state House last week on a bipartisan vote, with a Republican-led coalition of 67 supporting the legislation against 17 Democrats who opposed the measure. It originally passed out of the States' Rights Committee in late February and is now in the state Senate, where a broad coalition of activists - supporters of national sovereignty, private property, the Constitution, individual liberty, Tea Party groups, and more - is working to ensure its passage.

Of course, Oklahoma is just the latest state to take action against the highly controversial UN plan, which calls for a transformation of human civilization under the guise of promoting so-called "sustainability." In May of last year, Alabama became the first state to officially ban UN Agenda 21<http://thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/11592-alabama-adopts-first-official-state-ban-on-un-agenda-21> after a law to protect private property and due process rights was signed by Gov. Robert Bentley. The wildly popular bi-partisan legislation was approved unanimously in both houses of the state legislature.

Before that, lawmakers on both sides of the aisle in Tennessee adopted a resolution<http://thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/11120-tennessee-passes-resolution-slamming-“socialist”-un-agenda-21> blasting the dubious UN agenda as a radical "socialist" plot at odds with individual liberty, private-property rights, and the U.S. Constitution. Lawmakers in Kansas followed suit. Numerous other state governments, under heavy pressure from activists across the political spectrum, are also working to ban the "sustainable development" scheme in their jurisdictions. City and county governments, meanwhile, are taking action to protect residents, too.

In Oklahoma, lawmakers said legislation was needed to defend citizens and their rights from the UN scheme as well. Despite having never been ratified by the U.S. Senate as required by the Constitution, supporters of the bill explained, officials at all levels - especially the federal executive branch, mostly using unconstitutional "grants" and decrees - have been quietly working to implement the controversial 1992 international agreement across America.

"House Bill 1412 is a short little bill, barely two pages long; it deals with a big topic though, protecting personal property rights," noted Republican Rep. Sally Kern, who sponsored the legislation in the Oklahoma House. "This bill is specifically dealing with the intrusion of our government into personal property rights that has been happening for the last 20 years and is getting worse through the Agenda 21 of the UN, their sustainable development program."

Rep. Kern pointed out that as many as 10 federal agencies under multiple U.S. administrations - George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, and Barack Obama most recently - have been working to implement the UN scheme. She also offered numerous examples of the agenda being foisted on Oklahoma, noting that other states have passed similar legislation to protect citizens as well.

A handful of Democrats, apparently ignorant about UN Agenda 21, sounded confused during the questioning session on the House floor, asking bizarre questions such as whether or not cities would be barred from building bike lanes. Rep. Kern answered well. While noting that it is important to protect the environment, Kern said Oklahoma should not be subservient to outside forces - plus, as countless analysts have pointed out, Agenda 21 has little to do with protecting nature<http://thenewamerican.com/rio-20/item/12008-the-real-agenda-behind-un-“sustainability”-unmasked> anyway.

"One of the goals of the United Nations Agenda 21 Initiative is to influence governments," Kern explained<http://oklahomawelcome.com/politics/94800-rep-sally-kern-praises-lawmakers-on-agenda-21.html>. "My constituents are concerned about that influence and about their property rights being infringed upon by government regulations that originated from Agenda 21. My legislation addresses those concerns by protecting individual property rights."

Kern said it was "very easy" to see what was going on and which organizations were linked to the controversial global plan, urging fellow lawmakers to do some research and check out the UN website itself. "You can go and look up the President's Council on Sustainable Development," she added, singling out ICLEI - formerly known as the International Council of Local Environmental Initiatives - as one of the UN-linked groups working to foist the controversial "sustainability" plan on America and the world.

The ultimate UN plan was outlined and agreed to by national governments and dictatorships worldwide at the 1992 "Earth Summit" in Rio de Janeiro. "Agenda 21 is a comprehensive plan of action to be taken globally, nationally and locally by organizations of the United Nations System, Governments, and Major Groups in every area in which human impacts (sic) on the environment," the UN admits on its website<http://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/index.php?page=view&nr=23&type=400&menu=35>, sparking suspicions from analysts who point out that virtually every aspect of human existence has some "impact" on the "environment."

When one realizes that the UN considers carbon dioxide - a gas exhaled by humans and necessary to plant life - to be a pollutant<http://thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/13749-un-seeking-global-carbon-regime-at-climate-summit-in-doha>, the true scope of the global agenda becomes clear. Plus, as the UN admits<http://thenewamerican.com/rio-20/item/12008-the-real-agenda-behind-un-“sustainability”-unmasked> in its documents, the global organization believes private ownership of land should be curtailed. Other official papers and statements reveal that the UN is seeking a "complete transformation<http://thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/13877-un-doha-climate-summit-fails-to-enact-“complete-transformation”-of-the-world>" of the global economy in ways that are completely at odds with national sovereignty, individual liberty, American traditions of self-governance, and more. Even individuals' thoughts are in the crosshairs, according to UN documents<http://thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/11122-un-seeks-new-powers-to-remake-world-at-rio-sustainability-summit>.

The Oklahoma bill<http://webserver1.lsb.state.ok.us/cf_pdf/2013-14%20ENGR/hB/HB1412%20ENGR.PDF> passed by the House last week reads: "The state or any political subdivision of the state shall not adopt or implement policy recommendations that deliberately or inadvertently infringe upon or restrict private property rights without due process, as may be required by policy recommendations originating in, or traceable to United Nations Agenda 21/Sustainable Development." Also prohibited under the measure is state or local government participation in "any other international law or ancillary plan of action that contravenes the Constitution of the United States or the Oklahoma Constitution."

The legislation also ensures that state and local governments are barred from working with UN-linked groups promoting the controversial agenda. "Since the United Nations has accredited or enlisted numerous nongovernmental and intergovernmental organizations to assist in the implementation of its policies relative to United Nations Agenda 21/Sustainable Development around the world, the state and all political subdivisions of the state shall not enter into any agreement, expend any sum of money, receive funds contracting services or give financial aid to or from any nongovernmental or intergovernmental organizations accredited or enlisted by the United Nations," the bill continues.

Unsurprisingly, a few members of the increasingly discredited establishment press sought to demonize or ridicule supporters<http://www.newson6.com/story/21635959/oklahoma-house-approves-bill-targeting-agenda-21> of the legislation, variously claiming that opposition to Agenda 21 was either a "conspiracy theory" or that the UN scheme is harmless. It remains unclear why supporters of the UN plot continue to falsely allege that opponents consider it a "conspiracy" - a conspiracy is secret by definition, and the global organization has documents about Agenda 21<http://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/index.php?page=view&nr=23&type=400&menu=35> and the goals all over its website.

Analysts have also pointed out that if, as some proponents of the scheme claim, the UN agenda is non-binding and does virtually nothing, such fiendish opposition to laws protecting private property and due process would seem bizarre, almost ludicrous. However, despite half-baked efforts by the UN and its allies to vilify opponents of Agenda 21, it appears that grassroots pressure<http://www.democratsagainstunagenda21.com/> within both parties<http://thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/12675-gop-platform-rejects-un-agenda-21-as-threat-to-sovereignty> is having a significant effect.

The Oklahoma legislation to ban Agenda 21 will be assigned to a state Senate committee soon - probably within the week, according to sources in the legislature. If it eventually passes, as analysts and lawmakers widely expect, the bill would go to Republican Governor Mary Fallin to be signed into law. The governor's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Photo of Oklahoma State Capitol in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

Alex Newman is a correspondent for The New American, covering economics, politics, and more. He can be reached at anewman@…<mailto:anewman@…>.

Related articles:

Alabama Adopts First Official State Ban on UN Agenda 21 <http://thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/11592-alabama-adopts-first-official-state-ban-on-un-agenda-21>

Tennessee Passes Resolution Slamming "Socialist" UN Agenda 21 <http://thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/11120-tennessee-passes-resolution-slamming-“socialist”-un-agenda-21>

Virginia Takes On Sound Money, Federal Assaults, and UN Agenda 21<http://thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/item/14445-virginia-takes-on-sound-money-federal-assaults-and-un-agenda-21>

The Real Agenda Behind UN "Sustainability" Unmasked <http://thenewamerican.com/rio-20/item/12008-the-real-agenda-behind-un-“sustainability”-unmasked>

GMO Giant Monsanto Joins Big Business Coalition for UN Agenda 21<http://thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/14409-gmo-giant-monsanto-joins-big-business-coalition-for-un-agenda-21>

Powerful New Video Explores How Agenda 21 Will Affect You <http://thenewamerican.com/reviews/movies/item/12947-powerful-new-video-explores-how-agenda-21-will-affect-you>

UN Sustainability Summit Exposed: Big Business, Dictators, and NGOs<http://thenewamerican.com/rio-20/item/12015-un-sustainability-summit-exposed-big-business-dictators-and-ngos>

GOP Platform Rejects UN Agenda 21 as Threat to Sovereignty <http://thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/12675-gop-platform-rejects-un-agenda-21-as-threat-to-sovereignty>

Your Hometown & the United Nations' Agenda 21 <http://thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/6911-your-hometown--the-united-nations’-agenda-21>

Sustainable Freedom: Surging Opposition to Agenda 21, "Sustainable Development" <http://thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/11999-sustainable-freedom-surging-opposition-to-agenda-21-“sustainable-development”>

Mike

2

Our challenge is to repeal SB375.

________________________________
From: "mike@..." <mike@...>
To: "lpsf-discuss@yahoogroups.com" <lpsf-discuss@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 11:13 PM
Subject: [lpsf-discuss] Oklahoma House Passes Bill to Ban UN Agenda 21

http://thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/14833-oklahoma-house-passes-bill-to-ban-un-agenda-21

Oklahoma House Passes Bill to Ban UN Agenda 21
Written by Alex Newman

Following Alabama’s lead, lawmakers in the Oklahoma House of Representatives voted overwhelmingly to approve popular legislation protecting private-property rights and banning a controversial United Nations “sustainable development” scheme known as Agenda 21, which critics say represents a serious threat to American values and liberty. If approved by the Senate as expected, the law would also prohibit state and local governments from working with the UN or its affiliates to implement any sort of “international law” that violates the U.S. or Oklahoma constitutions.

The bill, H.B. 1412, was passed in the state House last week on a bipartisan vote, with a Republican-led coalition of 67 supporting the legislation against 17 Democrats who opposed the measure. It originally passed out of the States’ Rights Committee in late February and is now in the state Senate, where a broad coalition of activists — supporters of national sovereignty, private property, the Constitution, individual liberty, Tea Party groups, and more — is working to ensure its passage.

Of course, Oklahoma is just the latest state to take action against the highly controversial UN plan, which calls for a transformation of human civilization under the guise of promoting so-called “sustainability.” In May of last year, Alabama became the first state to officially ban UN Agenda 21 after a law to protect private property and due process rights was signed by Gov. Robert Bentley. The wildly popular bi-partisan legislation was approved unanimously in both houses of the state legislature.

Before that, lawmakers on both sides of the aisle in Tennessee adopted a resolution blasting the dubious UN agenda as a radical “socialist” plot at odds with individual liberty, private-property rights, and the U.S. Constitution. Lawmakers in Kansas followed suit. Numerous other state governments, under heavy pressure from activists across the political spectrum, are also working to ban the “sustainable development” scheme in their jurisdictions. City and county governments, meanwhile, are taking action to protect residents, too.

In Oklahoma, lawmakers said legislation was needed to defend citizens and their rights from the UN scheme as well. Despite having never been ratified by the U.S. Senate as required by the Constitution, supporters of the bill explained, officials at all levels

— especially the federal executive branch, mostly using unconstitutional “grants” and decrees — have been quietly working to implement the controversial 1992 international agreement across America.

“House Bill 1412 is a short little bill, barely two pages long; it deals with a big topic though, protecting personal property rights," noted Republican Rep. Sally Kern, who sponsored the legislation in the Oklahoma House. "This bill is specifically dealing

with the intrusion of our government into personal property rights that has been happening for the last 20 years and is getting worse through the Agenda 21 of the UN, their sustainable development program."

Rep. Kern pointed out that as many as 10 federal agencies under multiple U.S. administrations — George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, and Barack Obama most recently — have been working to implement the UN scheme. She also offered numerous examples of the agenda being

foisted on Oklahoma, noting that other states have passed similar legislation to protect citizens as well.

A handful of Democrats, apparently ignorant about UN Agenda 21, sounded confused during the questioning session on the House floor, asking bizarre questions such as whether or not cities would be barred from building bike lanes. Rep. Kern answered well. While

noting that it is important to protect the environment, Kern said Oklahoma should not be subservient to outside forces — plus, as countless analysts have pointed out, Agenda 21 has little to do with protecting nature anyway.

"One of the goals of the United Nations Agenda 21 Initiative is to influence governments," Kern explained. “My constituents are concerned about that influence and about their property rights being infringed upon by government regulations that originated from Agenda 21. My legislation addresses those concerns by protecting individual property rights.”

Kern said it was “very easy” to see what was going on and which organizations were linked to the controversial global plan, urging fellow lawmakers to do some research and check out the UN website itself. "You can go and look up the President's Council on Sustainable

Development," she added, singling out ICLEI — formerly known as the International Council of Local Environmental Initiatives — as one of the UN-linked groups working to foist the controversial “sustainability” plan on America and the world.

The ultimate UN plan was outlined and agreed to by national governments and dictatorships worldwide at the 1992 “Earth Summit” in Rio de Janeiro. “Agenda 21 is a comprehensive plan of action to be taken globally, nationally and locally by organizations of the

United Nations System, Governments, and Major Groups in every area in which human impacts (sic) on the environment,” the UN admits on its website, sparking suspicions from analysts who point out that virtually every aspect of human existence has some “impact” on the “environment.”

When one realizes that the UN considers carbon dioxide — a gas exhaled by humans and necessary to plant life — to be a pollutant, the true scope of the global agenda becomes clear. Plus, as the UNadmits in its documents, the global organization believes private ownership of land should be curtailed. Other official papers and statements reveal that the UN is seeking a "complete transformation" of the global economy in ways that are completely at odds with national sovereignty, individual liberty, American traditions of self-governance, and more. Even individuals' thoughts are in the crosshairs,according to UN documents.

The Oklahoma bill passed by the House last week reads: “The state or any political subdivision of the state shall not adopt or implement policy recommendations that deliberately or inadvertently infringe upon or restrict private property rights without due process, as may be required by policy recommendations originating in, or traceable to United Nations Agenda 21/Sustainable Development.” Also prohibited under the measure is state or local government participation in “any other international law or ancillary plan of action that contravenes the Constitution of the United States or the Oklahoma Constitution.”

The legislation also ensures that state and local governments are barred from working with UN-linked groups promoting the controversial agenda. “Since the United Nations has accredited or enlisted numerous nongovernmental and intergovernmental organizations

to assist in the implementation of its policies relative to United Nations Agenda 21/Sustainable Development around the world, the state and all political subdivisions of the state shall not enter into any agreement, expend any sum of money, receive funds
contracting services or give financial aid to or from any nongovernmental or intergovernmental organizations accredited or enlisted by the United Nations,” the bill continues.

Unsurprisingly, a few members of the increasingly discredited establishment press sought to demonize or ridicule supporters of the legislation, variously claiming that opposition to Agenda 21 was either a “conspiracy theory” or that the UN scheme is harmless. It remains unclear why supporters of the UN plot continue to falsely allege that opponents consider it a “conspiracy” — a conspiracy is secret by definition, and the global organization has documents about Agenda 21 and the goals all over its website.

Analysts have also pointed out that if, as some proponents of the scheme claim, the UN agenda is non-binding and does virtually nothing, such fiendish opposition to laws protecting private property and due process would seem bizarre, almost ludicrous. However,

despite half-baked efforts by the UN and its allies to vilify opponents of Agenda 21, it appears that grassroots pressure within both parties is having a significant effect.

The Oklahoma legislation to ban Agenda 21 will be assigned to a state Senate committee soon — probably within the week, according to sources in the legislature. If it eventually passes, as analysts and lawmakers widely expect, the bill would go to Republican

Governor Mary Fallin to be signed into law. The governor’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

3

Mike,
I thought I should include the Tea Party folks in this discussion. They are on the front lines of the battle to defend private property.

Here is good description of the global model underway. It is expanded and adopted in many forms, with the collectivist fervor of "agrarian reform".

"The public authorities in the Netherlands are charged with enhancing the well-being and living standards of all its inhabitants both now and in the future. The
protection and enhancement of the living environment is an important aspect of this duty, and is
enshrined in Article 21 of the Constitution. In seeking sustainable development - the main objective
of environmental policy - it becomes apparent that concern for the environment is part of a wider
concern aimed at well-being and living standards. The term "sustainable development" was coined by the UN Brundtland Committee to describe a development which satisfies the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs."

http://www.un.org/esa/agenda21/natlinfo/action/netherla.htm

There is no amount of
corruption and taxation beyond which they will not go, to achieve their
objective. The objective is to nationalize the environment. The Drake's Bay Oyster Farm
controversy is part of this nationalization and already there are seven
years of well-documented "dirty tricks" of such magnitude that even
Senator Feinstein has been in support of the farm.

This is well detailed here: http://oysterzone.wordpress.com/

The most recent appropriations and specifications, in California, proceed from SB 375. Without repeal of this law, money will continue to be taken from the people and used to control them and their property. This law makes sure the legions of "environmental soldiers" and planners are well-armed, well-fed and keep marching.

The oyster farm is a winnable battle to galvanize the necessary political will to take-on the repeal of SB375. There is significant political, business, and celebrity support. That's why the coalition to nationalize the resource is so quiet about it.

Every environmental organization under the sun is involved, but they know that if they make a ruckus, it will open the flood gate of potent opposition.

Plus this repeal will put the jobs of thousands of "environmental soldiers" on the chopping block... so there will be serious push back. But short of the entire country going broke, its repeal is the ONLY way to stop their advance. Otherwise its specifications will be on every agenda of every local government, being advanced by the legions of its soldiers.

The oyster-farm-contest is the opportunity to inspire the elements to form the political machine, necessary to repeal SB375. The executive team to conduct this enterprise will need to be smart and nimble. I'm thinking that candidates for office might be the people with enough familiarity with the political landscape to function effectively.

You know what that means. :slight_smile: In order to keep the demands to a minimum, things can be highly delegated. I'll start on that structure today. Monday night, I was in a meeting with John Dennis. I like how he works but we didn't get a chance to look at the project. If you have other people in mind let me know.

John

________________________________
From: John Bechtol <javlin@...>
To: "lpsf-discuss@yahoogroups.com" <lpsf-discuss@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 6:30 AM
Subject: Re: [lpsf-discuss] Oklahoma House Passes Bill to Ban UN Agenda 21

Our challenge is to repeal SB375.

________________________________
From: "mike@..." <mike@...>
To: "lpsf-discuss@yahoogroups.com" <lpsf-discuss@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 11:13 PM
Subject: [lpsf-discuss] Oklahoma House Passes Bill to Ban UN Agenda 21

http://thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/14833-oklahoma-house-passes-bill-to-ban-un-agenda-21

Oklahoma House Passes Bill to Ban UN Agenda 21
Written by Alex Newman

Following Alabama’s lead, lawmakers in the Oklahoma House of Representatives voted overwhelmingly to approve popular legislation protecting private-property rights and banning a controversial United Nations “sustainable development” scheme known as Agenda 21, which critics say represents a serious threat to American values and liberty. If approved by the Senate as expected, the law would also prohibit state and local governments from working with the UN or its affiliates to implement any sort of “international law” that violates the U.S. or Oklahoma constitutions.

The bill, H.B. 1412, was passed in the state House last week on a bipartisan vote, with a Republican-led coalition of 67 supporting the legislation against 17 Democrats who opposed the measure. It originally passed out of the States’ Rights Committee in late February and is now in the state Senate, where a broad coalition of activists — supporters of national sovereignty, private property, the Constitution, individual liberty, Tea Party groups, and more — is working to ensure its passage.

Of course, Oklahoma is just the latest state to take action against the highly controversial UN plan, which calls for a transformation of human civilization under the guise of promoting so-called “sustainability.” In May of last year, Alabama became the first state to officially ban UN Agenda 21 after a law to protect private property and due process rights was signed by Gov. Robert Bentley. The wildly popular bi-partisan legislation was approved unanimously in both houses of the state legislature.

Before that, lawmakers on both sides of the aisle in Tennessee adopted a resolution blasting the dubious UN agenda as a radical “socialist” plot at odds with individual liberty, private-property rights, and the U.S. Constitution. Lawmakers in Kansas followed suit. Numerous other state governments, under heavy pressure from activists across the political spectrum, are also working to ban the “sustainable development” scheme in their jurisdictions. City and county governments, meanwhile, are taking action to protect residents, too.

In Oklahoma, lawmakers said legislation was needed to defend citizens and their rights from the UN scheme as well. Despite having never been ratified by the U.S. Senate as required by the Constitution, supporters of the bill explained, officials at all levels

— especially the federal executive branch, mostly using unconstitutional “grants” and decrees — have been quietly working to implement the controversial 1992 international agreement across America.

“House Bill 1412 is a short little bill, barely two pages long; it deals with a big topic though, protecting personal property rights," noted Republican Rep. Sally Kern, who sponsored the legislation in the Oklahoma House. "This bill is specifically dealing

with the intrusion of our government into personal property rights that has been happening for the last 20 years and is getting worse through the Agenda 21 of the UN, their sustainable development program."

Rep. Kern pointed out that as many as 10 federal agencies under multiple U.S. administrations — George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, and Barack Obama most recently — have been working to implement the UN scheme. She also offered numerous examples of the agenda being

foisted on Oklahoma, noting that other states have passed similar legislation to protect citizens as well.

A handful of Democrats, apparently ignorant about UN Agenda 21, sounded confused during the questioning session on the House floor, asking bizarre questions such as whether or not cities would be barred from building bike lanes. Rep. Kern answered well. While

noting that it is important to protect the environment, Kern said Oklahoma should not be subservient to outside forces — plus, as countless analysts have pointed out, Agenda 21 has little to do with protecting nature anyway.

"One of the goals of the United Nations Agenda 21 Initiative is to influence governments," Kern explained. “My constituents are concerned about that influence and about their property rights being infringed upon by government regulations that originated from Agenda 21. My legislation addresses those concerns by protecting individual property rights.”

Kern said it was “very easy” to see what was going on and which organizations were linked to the controversial global plan, urging fellow lawmakers to do some research and check out the UN website itself. "You can go and look up the President's Council on Sustainable

Development," she added, singling out ICLEI — formerly known as the International Council of Local Environmental Initiatives — as one of the UN-linked groups working to foist the controversial “sustainability” plan on America and the world.

The ultimate UN plan was outlined and agreed to by national governments and dictatorships worldwide at the 1992 “Earth Summit” in Rio de Janeiro. “Agenda 21 is a comprehensive plan of action to be taken globally, nationally and locally by organizations of the

United Nations System, Governments, and Major Groups in every area in which human impacts (sic) on the environment,” the UN admits on its website, sparking suspicions from analysts who point out that virtually every aspect of human existence has some “impact” on the “environment.”

When one realizes that the UN considers carbon dioxide — a gas exhaled by humans and necessary to plant life — to be a pollutant, the true scope of the global agenda becomes clear. Plus, as the UNadmits in its documents, the global organization believes private ownership of land should be curtailed. Other official papers and statements reveal that the UN is seeking a "complete transformation" of the global economy in ways that are completely at odds with national sovereignty, individual liberty, American traditions of self-governance, and more. Even individuals' thoughts are in the crosshairs,according to UN documents.

The Oklahoma bill passed by the House last week reads: “The state or any political subdivision of the state shall not adopt or implement policy recommendations that deliberately or inadvertently infringe upon or restrict private property rights without due process, as may be required by policy recommendations originating in, or traceable to United Nations Agenda 21/Sustainable Development.” Also prohibited under the measure is state or local government participation in “any other international law or ancillary plan of action that contravenes the Constitution of the United States or the Oklahoma Constitution.”

The legislation also ensures that state and local governments are barred from working with UN-linked groups promoting the controversial agenda. “Since the United Nations has accredited or enlisted numerous nongovernmental and intergovernmental organizations

to assist in the implementation of its policies relative to United Nations Agenda 21/Sustainable Development around the world, the state and all political subdivisions of the state shall not enter into any agreement, expend any sum of money, receive funds
contracting services or give financial aid to or from any nongovernmental or intergovernmental organizations accredited or enlisted by the United Nations,” the bill continues.

Unsurprisingly, a few members of the increasingly discredited establishment press sought to demonize or ridicule supporters of the legislation, variously claiming that opposition to Agenda 21 was either a “conspiracy theory” or that the UN scheme is harmless. It remains unclear why supporters of the UN plot continue to falsely allege that opponents consider it a “conspiracy” — a conspiracy is secret by definition, and the global organization has documents about Agenda 21 and the goals all over its website.

Analysts have also pointed out that if, as some proponents of the scheme claim, the UN agenda is non-binding and does virtually nothing, such fiendish opposition to laws protecting private property and due process would seem bizarre, almost ludicrous. However,

despite half-baked efforts by the UN and its allies to vilify opponents of Agenda 21, it appears that grassroots pressure within both parties is having a significant effect.

The Oklahoma legislation to ban Agenda 21 will be assigned to a state Senate committee soon — probably within the week, according to sources in the legislature. If it eventually passes, as analysts and lawmakers widely expect, the bill would go to Republican

Governor Mary Fallin to be signed into law. The governor’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

4

Excellent John…I’d love to help you and others duke it out with these folks. But I’m currently swamped with business projects, family and plans to leave the country this June. While my spirit is willing….my flesh is seriously encumbered. Go get ‘em and keep me posted.

Mike

5

Agreed. We must repeal SB375. I also agree the Oyster Farm has become a
lightening rod of cross party support and can bring huge awareness.

*Heather Gass*

DRE # 01478987

*Better Homes and Gardens | Mason-McDuffie*

Tel: 510-220-0603

email: *heather.gass@...*

Website: www.bhghome.com/gasshomes

[image: email heather picture][image: sfr x050]

* *

*Confidentiality Notice: **
**This private email message, including any attachment(s) is limited to the
sole use of the intended recipient and may contain Privileged and/or
Confidential Information. Any and All Political, Private or Public
Entities, Federal, State, or Local Corporate Government(s),
Municipality(ies), International Organizations, Corporation(s), agent(s),
investigator(s), or informant(s), et. al., and/or Third Party(ies) working
in collusion by collecting and/or monitoring My email(s),and any other
means of spying and collecting these Communications Without my Exclusive
Permission are Barred from Any and All Unauthorized Review, Use, Disclosure
or Distribution. With Explicit Reservation of All My Rights, Without
Prejudice and Without Recourse to Me. Any omission does not constitute a
waiver of any and/or ALL Intellectual Property Rights or Reserved Rights
U.C.C.1-308. NOTICE TO AGENTS IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPALS. NOTICE TO
PRINCIPALS IS NOTICE TO AGENTS.*

6

Heather,
I'm working on a plan to have a booth at the "New Living Expo". I'm hoping the Seasteading Institute will take the lead and articulate the controversy along its lines. There are boatloads of advantages to this approach but but we must move quickly. There are only a few good spots left.

Otherwise, it will be more complicated but not the least bit impossible. In every case, it would be quite the "party", attracting a broad spectrum of players, from gourmets, to libertarians, to wineries, to politics, to the media, in the booth and visiting the booth, to organize for other events and initiatives.
John

(Attachment image001.jpg is missing)

(Attachment image002.jpg is missing)

(Attachment image003.jpg is missing)

(Attachment image004.jpg is missing)