Allan wrote:
I read this to mean no
sustaining agencies and no money to redistribute. Was there another
possible interpretation that I missed?
Yes.
Another possible interpretation would involve human action: free market sustaining agencies and wealth redistributed by individuals trading with each other. IOW, laissez-faire capitalism.
Best, Michael
I see.
Do the "free market sustaining agencies" compete with one another?
If so, how do they resolve disputes?
Allen
Allan wrote:
> I read this to mean no
> sustaining agencies and no money to redistribute. Was there
another
> possible interpretation that I missed?
Yes.
Another possible interpretation would involve human action: free
market sustaining agencies and wealth redistributed by individuals
trading with each other. IOW, laissez-faire capitalism.
Best, Michael
From: Allen Rice
To: lpsf-discuss@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 3:08 PM
Subject: [lpsf-discuss] MORE ON MORE MORE ON Re: Greedy GeezersMichael,
Like I said in the original posted question (questions having been
asked for):"the millions, who have been suckered for more than a century into
believing that the "goverment" is responsible for sustaining them,
now destitute of that support because you have cancelled taxes".This was in response to the proposed situation in which all the
acronymous government agencies were done away with, as well as all
personal and corporate income taxes. I read this to mean no
sustaining agencies and no money to redistribute. Was there
another
possible interpretation that I missed?
Regards,
Allen>
> Allen,
>
> You wrote:
> > burning buildings down and killing the "rich"
>
> What are you supposing would lead to this worst case scenario--
too
much liberty and
> not enough Govt?
>
> Best, Michael
>
> From: Allen Rice
> To: lpsf-discuss@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 9:37 AM
> Subject: [lpsf-discuss] MORE ON MORE MORE ON Re: Greedy Geezers
>
>
> Yes.
>
> What would you do when the millions, who have been suckered for
more
> than a century into believing that the "goverment" is
responsible
> for sustaining them, now destitute of that support because you
have
> cancelled taxes, take to the streets and start burning buildings
> down and killing the "rich"?
>
> Remember that you are no longer able to pay the police and
firemen,
> because: guess where their pay came from.
>
> Allen Rice
>
> --- In lpsf-discuss@yahoogroups.com, "tradergroupe"
> <tradergroupe@y...> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Derek;
> >
> > Actually the opinion I sent previously to you is what is known
as
> > twitting or sarcasm or satire. What's your pleasure?
> >
> > Personally all those programs you mentioned need to be trashed
and
> > the government needs to get its hand out of my and everybody
elses
> > wallets.
> >
> > If I could I would stop each and everyone with the ring of the
> > proverbial bell where once rung and all taxes cease completely.
> >
> > I would cut all the alphabet soup govt agencies and pull the
> > military back from the 150 bases it occupies around the world
sell
> > all the national parks and federally owned land to private
> > individuals and sell the TV radio airwave frequencies to the
> owners
> > at the highest bid then I'd cut all personal and corporate
taxes
> > inform Congress they weren't needed for the rest of their
session
> > and I'd let them know when they could come back until then
keep