Mainstream news in South Africa today, but not considered a story by any major media here except Washington Post

http://www.news24.com/News24/World/News/0,,2-10-1462_1977097,00.html

Pentagon 'lied over 9/11'
02/08/2006 14:13 - (SA)

Washington - The 10-member commission that investigated the US response to
the September 11 attacks considered seeking a criminal probe of the
Pentagon, believing it had deliberately misled the panel and the public, The
Washington Post said on Wednesday.

The panel found discrepancies between statements officials of the North
American Aerospace Command (NORAD) and the Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA) made about their response to the hijackings and audiotapes and e-mails
later made available.

The panel, in a secret meeting at the close of its investigation in 2004,
decided there was probable cause to believe the officials had broken the law
by making false statements in the hope of hiding their bungled response,
sources knowledgeable of the debate told the newspaper.

The commission, however, decided to refer the matter not to the justice
department but to the inspectors general for the defence and transportation
departments, who can make criminal referrals if they see fit.

The inspectors general report is complete and is being drafted, an FAA
spokesperson told the daily without divulging any aspect of the report.

Pentagon claimed jets were scrambled

Originally, vague and at times contradictory statements about how the
Pentagon tracked one or more of the four hijacked airliners were attributed
to the confusion prevalent on the day of the attacks.

The Pentagon for the first two years after the attacks maintained that its
response had been quick and that jets had been scrambled in response to the
last two hijackings.

But after analysing the audiotapes and other material the commission
subpoenaed from NORAD and FAA, panel members found that the air force never
had any of the hijacked airliners in its sights.

'This is not spin. This is not true'

"I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was
described," John Farmer, a former New Jersey attorney general who led the
staff inquiry into events on September 11, told the daily in a recent
interview.

"The tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us
and the public for two years ... This is not spin. This is not true."

(Attachment image001.gif is missing)

(Attachment image002.gif is missing)

Dear Jeff 111;

See the attached PDF it's from the street edition of the SF Examiner it reports the deception. Also see these newspapers reporting on the topic:

Pentagon suspected of deception in 9-11 investigation
Monsters and Critics.com, UK - 43 minutes ago
Washington - The commission set up to investigate the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks suspected that Pentagon officials were untruthful in describing the ...
9/11 panel talked of Pentagon lies Chicago Tribune
9/11 Panel Suspected Deception by Pentagon Washington Post
Account of Sept. 11 events questioned Kansas City Star

Looks like more than just a South African newspapers reporting - okay?

and of course: 911 "Conspiracy Theorists" Vindicated: Pentagon deliberately ... see the url:

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=EGG20060802&articleId=2887

Ron Getty
SF Libertarian

noon8window.pdf (36 Bytes)

(Attachment image001.gif is missing)

(Attachment image002.gif is missing)

Thanks for the info. I'm glad this story is getting this coverage.

(Attachment image001.gif is missing)

(Attachment image002.gif is missing)

Dear Jeff 111;

At the sake of sounding redundant as far as the group is concerned it's just more fuel to the fire about the government lies as to what really happened on 9/11 and the coverup of what really happened and why the government does not want the real story to get out about the Bush Regime complicity in 9/11 either from total indifference to the high red alert urgent warnings or being acquiescient backers as a result of the indifference. 3,000 dead people - hey Bush has knocked off 10 tens that many innocent civilians in Irag and at least that many innocent civilians in Afghanistan.

Roosevelt had his "surprise - surprise - surprise" attack on Pearl Harbor why shouldn't the Bush Regime have its "surprise" 9/11 attack?

Ron Getty
SF Libertarian

(Attachment image001.gif is missing)

(Attachment image002.gif is missing)