FYI....we should probably take some position on this subject....there is
a combination of issues including property rights to be considered
here....just wondering if anyone has any ideas.
Mike
(Attachment image001.jpg is missing)
Dear Mike;
Is it possible to get a copy of the Prop J somewhere so someone can read it over? While time is short who can get a copy and do an unbiased review of the Prop J? Then submit a report to the LPSF Discuss for opinions.
Ron Getty
SF Libertarian
Mike Denny <mike@...> wrote:
FYI�.we should probably take some position on this subject�.there is a combination of issues including property rights to be considered here�.just wondering if anyone has any ideas.
Mike
Ever since RBASF teamed up with Gonzalez to prop up their corrupt exploitation
of existing codes requirements, I really don't want to be their ally on
ANYTHING. But I also don't like the idea of taxpayers subsidizing new
buildings. Frankly, if Prop J just did away with the environmental studies,
I'd be for it, but the subsidy sounds like too much. I suppose one could make
the argument that, with as much as we tax property owners in SF, the subsidy
will not even let them break even in the long run. So I'm borderline "in
favor" / "no position" on J. But I certainly don't want to back RBASF.