Rob,
It should be obvious that had there truly been consensus, that
wouldn't have happened. As you may recall from last meeting, I was not
the only one voting against approving the minutes.
If you have any actual evidence that Direct Action Forum has been a
net negative for the LPSF, please share it with us. You seem awfully
vehement to be basing your assertion purely on speculation.
<<< Starchild >>>
On Wednesday, November 19, 2003, at 09:36 AM, Rob Power wrote (in
part):
As it is now? Absolutely. Net negative. Without a doubt. Probably
didn't say it so bluntly before, but apparently bluntness is all that
gets through.
We reached amicable consensus TWO MONTHS AGO, but you had to scream
"Parliamentary Procedure" and question Marcy's minutes of the
meeting. That's why we're headed for this vote.
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
Printer at MyInks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada.
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3exGAA/qnsNAA/69cplB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
lpsf-activists-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to Yahoo | Mail, Weather, Search, Politics, News, Finance, Sports & Videos