[ba-liberty] Re: Freedom above and below the waist


  It's strange to hear a libertarian make what sounds like an argument that something isn't valid unless it's sanctioned by "the" government or a major church. Also, as previously noted regarding being "faithful," not everyone believe "fidelity" has to imply monogamy. Mockery won't change this fact or sweep it under the rug. Still looking forward to hearing your definitions of "morality," "vice," etc., unless you've decided to abandon substantive discussion.

Yours in liberty,
            <<< Starchild >>>