Yeah, I wasn't keen on that part either, Aubrey. I can see the argument of it being better to pay a builder fair market value than to have the "taking" of mandated affordable housing at a builder's expense, but then it's the taxpayers on the hook, and maybe the city owning it as you say. But you of course aren't obligated to mention that option in your letter; I left it out of mine on purpose.
Love & Liberty,
((( starchild )))