2nd Analysis of Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s “plan” to hold judges accountable; and proposal that can bring about transformative change in the judiciary by applying enlightened self-interest [1 Attachment]

NOTE: I would be grateful if you would acknowledge receipt of this email. I kindly encourage you to share and post it to social media as widely as possible in your own interest and that of the rest of We the People.To subscribe to articles similar to the one hereunder go to http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org <left panel ↓Register or + New or Users >Add New Analysis of Sen. Elizabeth Warren's "plan"
to hold judges accountable; and
proposal that can bring about
transformative change in the judiciary
by reading, thinking strategically, and
applying enlightened self-interest
http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_SenEWarren_plan_judges.pdf
ByDr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
Ph.D., University of Cambridge, England
M.B.A., University of Michigan Business School
D.E.A., La Sorbonne, ParisJudicial Discipline Reform
New York City
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@verizon.net , DrRCordero@Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org , CorderoRic@yahoo.com Dear Advocates of Honest Judiciaries, Thank you for your comments on the below article. A. To reach our objective, we need a strategy to go from here to there 1. We share as a common objective "the protection of the rights of the average citizen and the holding of judges to their oaths of office to fully uphold the Constitution". 2. However, without strategic thinking to reach that objective, everything remains at the level of wishful thinking. The process of getting from the current situation to the objective is missing. 3. Dashing off a blog-like one paragraph attack at abusive judges, however justified, without proposing a clearly defined objective to be reached through concrete, reasonable, and feasible steps amounts to nothing: The attack is only the cry of pain of impotent abusees. 4. Judges do not even defend against it. They simply dismiss it as 'the whining of disgruntled losers'. 5. Is that all the reaction we want to provoke with a blog-paragraph cry? B. The failure to read betrays lack of commitment, stamina, and capacity to take on life-appointed judges 6. People who do not want to even invest effort and time in reading the whole of my article are not justified in discarding it. They do a disservice to themselves and to everybody else who is looking for a reasonably calculated way of making any progress toward an objective toward which none has been made ever: holding judges accountable and liable to their victims. 7. Non-readers only reveal their lack of commitment, stamina, and emotional and intellectual capacity to take on the most powerful public officers in our country: life-appointed federal judges, who abusively and risklessly wield power over our property, liberty, and all the rights and duties that frame our lives and shape our identity. 8. A single federal judge can suspend nationwide an executive order of a President that ran on issuing it and received the votes of 62.5 million people. 9... Do you think that judges so powerful pay any attention to a blog-paragraph cry? C. Reading a strategic article because KNOWLEDGE IS POWER 10. We need people who recognize that KNOWLEDGE IS POWER and ignorance perpetuates weakness and abuse. 11. Those people make the effort to read a 3-page article written on their behalf by a lawyer, and a doctor of law at that, who has engaged in professional law research and writing, and strategic thinking, and produced a two-volume study of judges and their judiciaries, titled and downloadable thus: Exposing Judges' Unaccountability and
Consequent Riskless Abuse of Power:
Pioneering the news and publishing field of
judicial unaccountability reporting* † * Volume 1: http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates.pdf >all prefixes:page# up to prefix OL:page393 † Volume 2: http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates.pdf >from page OL2:394 a. Download the volume files using MS Edge, Firefox, or Chrome; it may happen that Internet Explorer only downloads a blank page. b. Open the downloaded files using Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available for free at https://acrobat.adobe.com/us/en/acrobat/pdf-reader.html. c. In each downloaded file, go to the Menu bar >View >Navigation Panels >Bookmarks panel and use its bookmarks, which make navigating to the contents' numerous(* †>blue references) very easy. 12. Readers reflect upon the strategy that aims to reach the only entity that can force the holding of judges accountable and liable: an informed and outraged national public. 13. We, Advocates of Honest Judiciaries, do not have the means of reaching that public. Hence, we need "allies" who do, even if they will only do so to advance their own interests, not ours. But in so doing, they can help us advance toward our objective. 14. This applies the strategic thinking principle of enlightened self-interest: One helps first the other person advance her own interest because as she uses that help she advances one's interest(†>OL2:941, 815). D. Taking advantage of the unimaginable: a national politician dare denounce federal judges' abuse of power 15. Our key objective is to hold judges accountable and liable to their victims. Alone we cannot attain it. So we have engaged in strategic thinking. The resulting strategy to attain it is to form a national civic apolitical single-issue movement for judicial abuse of power exposure, compensation, and reform. 16. Implementing the strategy begins with posing the issue of judges' abuse of power to those who have an interest of their own in discussing it publicly AND who have the means of bringing it to the attention of the national media and public. 17. Sen. Elizabeth Warren is and has done what exceeds the realm of our imagination: She is one of the two frontrunners of the presidential race, so she has practically unlimited access to the national media and public. In addition, she is the only politician who has dare criticize federal judges for their abuse of power. We want to turn her into our unwitting "ally" even as she pursues her own electoral interest. 18. If many of the hundreds of thousands of people that have made Sen. Warren a frontrunner read the below article and share it with two friends or family members, the article could go viral, which would increase the chances of its reaching not only Sen. Warren, but also the other presidential candidates, and the media. 19. We need the media as our "ally": In their own commercial interest and pursuit of a Pulitzer prize, media outlets and journalists can disseminate the contents of the below article to the national public. 20. Thereby we could attain one of our key intermediate objectives: to insert in the presidential campaign the issue of unaccountable judges' riskless abuse of power. 21. That is a key stepping stone toward our objective of forming the national movement for holding judges accountable and liable. 22. Sen. Warren has unwittingly presented us with a unique strategic opportunity and We must not miss it! E. Join in implementing the strategy by taking these concrete, reasonable, and feasible steps 23. Therefore, I respectfully encourage you to take the following steps to implement the strategy: a. read and reread the below article until you feel confident that you can explain to others its underlying facts and cogent logic; b. share and post it to social media as widely as possible; and c. share with Judicial Discipline Reform what is indispensable to continue its professional research and writing, and strategic thinking: Put your money
where your outrage at abuse and
passion for justice are because

Every meaningful cause needs resources for its advancement;
none can be advanced without money Donatethrough PayPalhttps://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=HBFP5252TB5YJ or at
the GoFundMe campaign at
https://www.gofundme.com/expose-unaccountable-judges-abuse 24. I offer to present the below article and the application for venture capital to you and your colleagues at a video conference or in person… You may use the information below to contact me and discuss the presentation's terms and conditions and its scheduling. Sincerely, Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
Judicial Discipline Reform
2165 Bruckner Blvd
Bronx, New York 10472-6506
Tel. (718)827-9521
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org https://www.linkedin.com/in/dr-richard-cordero-esq-0508ba4b Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@verizon.net, DrRCordero@Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org, CorderoRic@yahoo.com NOTE: Given the interference with Dr. Cordero's email and e-cloud storage accounts described at *>ggl:1 et seq., when emailing him, copy the above bloc of his email addresses and paste it in the To: line of your email so as to increase the chances of your email reaching him at least at one of those addresses.************************************ Analysis of Sen. Elizabeth Warren's "plan"
to hold judges accountable; and
proposal that can bring about
transformative change in the judiciary
http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_SenEWarren_plan_judges.pdf
ByDr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
Ph.D., University of Cambridge, England
M.B.A., University of Michigan Business School
D.E.A., La Sorbonne, ParisJudicial Discipline Reform
New York City
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@verizon.net , DrRCordero@Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org , CorderoRic@yahoo.com I would like to submit to your consideration and your colleagues' this proposal for: 1. the publication of one(†>OL2:991, 998) or a series(OL2:719§C) of my articles: a. analyzing Sen. Elizabeth Warren's "plan" to hold judges accountable for failing to recuse themselves when they have conflicts of interest due to their holding shares in one of the parties before them and instead resolving the conflicts to that party and their own benefit; and b. exposing unaccountable judges' riskless abuse of power(†>OL2:971§A) and holding them liable to compensate their victims, who are entitled to the equal protection of the law that judges afford victims of malpracticing doctors and lawyers, and their hospitals and law firms; pedophilic priests and their churches; Harvey Weinstein-like sexual abusers; wrongdoing officers of the other branches; etc.; 2. a joint investigation of public interest stories that can affect the presidential campaign: a. judges' interception of people's emails and mail(OL2:781) in order to detect and suppress those critical of their abuse and ward off the constitutional checks and balances of the other branches; on the application hereto of the legal standard of "probable cause to believe that the defendant has committed the offense with which he or she has been charged" see †>OL2:974§B, 930§C); b. judges' failure to read the vast majority of the briefs(†>OL2:760) that they require of every litigant, who must spend $1Ks and even $10Ks to produce them and who would be outraged upon learning that without reading them the judges dump the corresponding cases and motions out of their caseload by having their clerks rubberstamp unresearched, unreasoned, arbitrary, fiat-like orders contained in 5¢ dumping forms, whereas a tiny minority of briefs of interest to the judges benefit from their unequal protection of the law by being read and discussed by them in opinions with precedential value that they write, sign, and have published(†>OL2:457§D); 3. investment of venture capital: a. in the website at http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org, whose articles, though unaccompanied by pictures or videos, exert such intense public appeal as to attract so many webvisitors that 28,176 and counting(†>OL2:Appendix 3) have become subscribers, which makes it a sound business proposition to develop the site from a free informational into a for-profit(OL2:914) interactive one that sells ads, goods, and services, e.g., fee-paying research; and b. to sponsor the business plan's programmatic activities(†>OL2:916§C, 978§E) that can turn a profit. 4. The foundation of this proposal is found in my professional study of judges and their judiciaries: Exposing Judges' Unaccountability and
Consequent Riskless Abuse of Power:
Pioneering the news and publishing field of
judicial unaccountability reporting* † * http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform…org/OL/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates.pdf † http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform…org/OL2/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates.pdf a. Download the volume files using MS Edge, Firefox, or Chrome; it may happen that Internet Explorer only downloads a blank page. b. Open the downloaded files using Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available for free at https://acrobat.adobe.com/us/en/acrobat/pdf-reader.html. c. In each downloaded file, go to the Menu bar >View >Navigation Panels >Bookmarks panel and use its bookmarks, which make navigating to the contents' numerous(* †>blue references) very easy. 5. You may wish to review my presentation video and slides, and their introduction(OL2:974): http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_judges_abuse_video.mp4 http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_judges_abuse_slides.pdf 6. More than 50 million cases are filed in the state and federal courts annually(*>jur:8fn4,5), to which must be added the scores of millions of cases pending or deemed to have been decided wrongly or wrongfully. They have generated the huge untapped leaderless voting bloc of The Dissatisfied with the Judicial and Legal System. 7. To explain how this proposal can attract them to you, make you money, and turn you into a national Champion of Justice I offer to present it to you and your colleagues by video conference or in person. So I look forward to hearing from you. Dare trigger history!(†>OL2:953)…and you may enter it. Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq. Judicial Discipline Reform
2165 Bruckner Blvd.
Bronx, NY 10472-6506
Tel. (718)827-9521
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org https://www.linkedin.com/in/dr-richard-cordero-esq-0508ba4b Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@verizon.net, DrRCordero@Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org, CorderoRic@yahoo.com NOTE: Given the interference with Dr. Cordero's email and e-cloud storage accounts described at *>ggl:1 et seq., when emailing him, copy the above bloc of his email addresses and paste it in the To: line of your email so as to increase the chances of your email reaching him at least at one of those addresses. ***********************************Sen. Elizabeth Warren's "plan"
to hold judges accountable;
her unrealistic expectation that
Congress and judges will implement it; and
an informed and outraged public that can do so
when its political power is strongest and
enables it to bring about
transformative change
http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_SenEWarren_plan_judges.pdf By Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
Ph.D., University of Cambridge, England
M.B.A., University of Michigan Business School
D.E.A., La Sorbonne, ParisJudicial Discipline Reform
New York City
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@verizon.net , DrRCordero@Judicial-Discipline-Reform…org , CorderoRic@yahoo.com 8. Senator Elizabeth Warren has dare criticize federal judges. She is the first presidential candidate to do so, denouncing how those judges resolve financial conflicts of interests to their benefit, e.g., far from the judges recusing themselves from cases in one of the parties to which they hold shares, deciding them in favor of that party and their own. 9. Sen. Warren's "plan" would hold them to the duty to disclose those conflicts and be liable for mishandling them to investigation by the Judicial Conference of the U.S. and Congress, and removal from office by the latter. 10. Yet, the members of those two entities have known for years about judges' abusive handling of conflicts and other forms of abuse(*>jur:146fn272), but have failed to take measures to expose, punish, and prevent them, as shown in the study* † of judges and their judiciaries, which constitutes the basis of this article: Exposing Judges' Unaccountability and
Consequent Riskless Abuse of Power:
Pioneering the news and publishing field of
judicial unaccountability reporting* † A. A frightened Congress will continue to cover for 'its' judges, lest they retaliate 11. The Conference was set up under Title 28 of the Code of federal laws, section 331 (28 U.S.C. §331). It is composed of the chief judges of the 13 federal circuits and the U.S. Court of International Trade, and an elected district judge from each of the 12 circuits with such judges. It is presided over by the Supreme Court chief justice, who convenes it behind closed doors twice a year. "The Conference shall make a comprehensive survey of the condition of business in the courts of the United States [and] is authorized to exercise the authority provided [in the Judicial Conduct and Disability Act of 1980, (§351-364; the Act), which requires all complaints against federal judges to be submitted to, and processed by, federal judges]. The Chief Justice shall submit to Congress an annual report of the proceedings of the Judicial Conference and its recommendations for legislation." (§331) 12. Congress has also learned about the condition of the federal courts through the Annual Report (§604(a)(4)), filed as a public document, of the Director of the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, who is appointed and removable by the Supreme Court chief justice (§601). 13. What is more: "The Director…shall include in his annual report filed with the Congress…a summary of the number of complaints filed with each judicial council under [the Act], indicating the general nature of such complaints and the disposition of those complaints in which action has been taken." (§604(h)(2)) 14. The annual reports since 1996 are available on the Administrative Office's website. Their official statistics(†>OL2:795§C) show that federal judges for decades have dismissed 100% of complaints against them and denied 100% of the petitions to review those dismissals(*>jur:10-14). 1. An outrageous instance of abuse of power involving the top justice and judges 15. In fact, the official statistics compiled by the Court of Appeals for the U.S. District of Columbia Circuit, the most prestigious federal court after the Supreme Court, show that Then-Judge Brett Kavanaugh, Chief Judge Merrick Garland –nominated by Presidents Trump and Obama to the Supreme Court, respectively–, and their peers received 478 complaints against judges in their Circuit during the 1oct06/30sep17 11-year period, but abused their power to dismiss 100% of them(†>OL2:748) and deny all review petitions… a. A complaint about that abuse(†>OL2:792) was filed with the DC Circuit Court of Appeals, which referred it to Chief Justice John Roberts, Jr., who in turn assigned it for disposition to the 11th Circuit. b. Predictably, the latter dismissed it and denied the petition for review of such dismissal(†>OL2:918; see also the statistics on Then-Judge, Now-Justice Neil Gorsuch and the 10th Circuit(OL2:548) and J. Sonia Sotomayor and the 2nd Circuit(*>jur:11)). 2. A sham process: judges extort mutual exoneration while leaving complainants at their mercy 16. Indeed, judges have known for decades of each other's abuse of power(†>OL2:976§A), e.g., trading for their own account even if based on information in documents filed under seal by parties or discussed in chambers confidentially with them. 17. But they have failed their duty to report any abuse. Had they reported it, they would have been treated as treasonous pariahs by the other judges. 18. So they looked the other way or, worse yet, engaged in the same inside trading and all other forms of abuse. They did and do it for their own personal and class survival, for all justices and judges have written on their forehead this stern warning to each other: "I know about all the abuse that you have committed or covered up. If you now bring me down, I'll take you with me!" 19. While on 30sep18, the number of federal judicial officers was 2,255, in the last 230 years since the creation of the Federal Judiciary in 1789, the number of federal judges impeached and removed from office is 8!(*>jur:21§1) 20. 'All their peer men and women' end up exonerated and unaccountable. Unaccountability breeds riskless abuse of power. a. Cf. Washington Post Reporter Carl Bernstein referred to President Nixon's White House during the 1972-1974 Watergate scandal as "a criminal enterprise"; "All the President's men"(*>jur:4fn3) went to prison. 3. A Congress interested only in protecting itself, not the public, from 'its' judges' retaliation 21. Congress granted federal judges self-disciplining authority through its Act(supra ¶2)… But it is not in its interest to supervise their exercise of such authority, never mind their abrogation of the Act in effect by dismissing and denying 100% of complaints and review petitions: a. The senators confirmed those justices and judges. They will not indict their own capacity to evaluate character and conduct a competent vetting procedure by turning around and admitting that 'all our men and women' on the bench are individually dishonest and collectively members of 'a racketeering branch'(18 U.S.C. §1961). 22. The Senate and the House have practiced willful ignorance and blindness(*>jur:88§§a-c) to avoid judges' devastating power of retaliation: a. Judges can declare laws and even political agendas unconstitutional(*>jur:23fn17) or decide against either chamber every suit that it filed against the other or the Executive Branch or filed by political rivals during electoral campaigns. 23. Judges bear on their forehead a condonation-exacting warning for the politicians that empowered them and enabled them to develop a very long memory by giving them a life-appointment: 'Don't you ever mess with us!' 24. For proof of judges' devastating power: a single federal one suspended nationwide the Muslim travel ban ordered by a President that campaigned on issuing it and was elected by 62.5 million voters(†>OL2:993¶8e). 25. Judges exert their power as an expression of their gang mentality(OL2:569¶¶13-14): a. Then-Judge Gorsuch said during his confirmation process, «An attack on one of our brothers and sisters of the robe is an attack on all of us»(†>OL2:546). b. Through that statement, he revealed that judges deem the rule of law and ethical considerations meaningless when it comes to defending their interests. They think in terms of 'us against the rest of the world'. The gang must not lose face. They must protect each of its members, even if he or she raped the rule of law. To that end, they resort to fear, retaliation, and lawlessness. 26. Congress cowers and covers for each of 'its' judges, no matter the nature, frequency, and gravity of the complaints against them. As a result, both Congress and judges leave all complainants and the rest of the public, including you, the Reader, at the mercy of a racketeering gang of abusive judges.
B. Sen. Warren can denounce abuse that informs and outrages, thus setting in motion a process 27. Sen. Warren has courageously denounced judges' abusive resolution in their favor of their conflicts of interests. That constitutes only one type of abuse out of all forms of abuse that unaccountable judges have turned into their coordinated and their Judiciary's institutionalized modus operandi(>jur:49§4). 28. However, her "plan" to have their abuse eliminated by the very Congress and judges who condone it and have the greatest interest in maintaining it is doomed as objectively unrealistic. 1. A process that establishes the circumstances enabling the abuse 29. The national media and public must be informed of unaccountable judges' riskless abuse(†>OL2:971§A) and Sen. Warren's unrealistic "plan" to curb it. If so, they will be outraged. 30. Through a reciprocally reinforcing dynamic, an outraged public can give the media a competitive and commercial incentive to launch a Ukrainian scandal-like generalized journalistic investigation. 31. It must aim at a full exposure of the nature, frequency, and gravity of judges' abuse; it can pursue concrete leads(*>OL:194§E). Its findings can outrage so intensely that abuse-curbing measures that today appear inconceivable will become inevitable; and drive Sen. Warren to adopt based thereon a fact-consistent realistic "plan". 32. So, there must be held nationally televised congressional hearings and unprecedented citizens hearings conducted in the public interest by the media and universities(†>OL2:916¶13.i), not interest-conflicted politicians, and proposing realistic judicial accountability legislation. 33. Outrage can motivate judges and their clerks to become Deep Throat(*>jur:106§c) confidential informants(*>OL:180; †>OL2:468) and the new kinds of transformative agents of our public life: clearly present and more 'dangerous' Whistleblowers and officers that defy their superiors' gag orders and testify under subpoena before Congress's fact-finding committees. 34. These agents are candidates for Time's Persons of the Year and champions in the documentary: Black Robed Predators!
when the judges are the abusers(OL2:879) C. Implementing the inform and outrage strategy when the public is strongest 35. This out-of-court inform and outrage strategy to expose judges' abuse can be especially effective now: During a presidential campaign, the national public wields its strongest power to volunteer for campaign work, donate, spread the word, and vote. 36. An outraged public can force each of the presidential candidates to take a stand on such abuse at their rallies and townhall meetings, and at press conferences, op-eds, and the presidential debates. 37. In addition, because the overcrowded field of 20+ candidates splits media and public attention, and the impeachment inquiry sucks it in, each candidate is desperate to break an issue that captures that attention and saves him or her from having to drop out. 38. That issue is abuse by judges and their judiciaries as their way of doing business and holding them accountable AND liable to compensate their victims, as all other abusers and their victims are, because in 'government, not of men and women, but by the rule of law'(*>OL:5fn6) The Law is Equal for All. 39. Two types of abuse will be intensely outrageous and draw victims together to demand compensation: a. judges' interception of people's emails and mail and suppression of those critical of judges(supra ¶2a), which tramples on Americans' most cherished constitutional guarantees of 'freedom of speech, the press, and assembly [including through the Internet and social media], and compensation by the government [of which judges form the third branch]'; and can outrage more than the Snowden/NSA scandal, where the illegal mass surveillance of phone calls did not suppress any call(†>OL2:995§B); and b. judges' failure to read most briefs(supra ¶2b), which warrants a national movement for parties to join in demanding from the court where they had or have cases and its judges the refund of the filing fees that they paid and compensation for the funds, effort, and expectations(†>OL2:729) wasted on unread briefs. 40. By Sen. Warren making these compensation demands, she will attract The Dissatisfied(supra ¶6) and force the other candidates to emulate her, lest they cede that huge voting bloc to her. She and they can thus insert the issue of judges' abuse in the campaign. 41. Media and public outrage can be so intense as to force justices and judges to resign, as it did Justice Abe Fortas in 1969(*>jur:92§d). 42. That can give the next president and Senate majority a historic opportunity: to nominate and confirm the majority or even the whole of the Supreme Court and lower courts. This will allow them to implement their agenda and even fashion a new form of government where We the People, the masters of all public servants, hold also our judicial public servants accountable and liable. 43. That would be transformative change(†>OL2:971§B). By sharing and posting this article as widely as possible, you will increase the chances that it will outrage the public, the media, Sen. Warren, and the other candidates. 44. You can thus become recognized as one of the People's Champions of Justice. D. Put your money where your outrage at abuse and passion for justice are because Every meaningful cause needs resources for its advancement;
none can be advanced without money 45. Hence, I have written a prospectus(†>OL2:914)‡ to apply to venture capitalists for venture capital –not a loan– to run Judicial Discipline Reform as a for-profit business guided by the motto: Making money while doing justice.‡ http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero-Venture_Capitalists.pdf 46. The capital will help Judicial Discipline Reform to continue its professional and original law research and writing, and strategic thinking. 47. It will also enhance its website at http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org. Its public appeal is so extensive that out of its many visitors it has turned into subscribers 28,236 and counting(†>OL2:Appendix 3). That proven appeal can be fostered and monetized by enhancing the site from an informational one into: a. a clearinghouse for complaints(†>OL2:918) about judges that anybody can upload; and b. a research center for auditing(*>OL:274-280, 304-307) many complaints in search of(*>jur:131§b, *>OL:255) the most persuasive type of evidence, i.e., patterns(†>OL2:792§A), trends, and schemes(OL2:614) of abuse of power. 48. Capital is also needed to undertake the concrete, realistic, and feasible Programmatic Activities(†>OL2:916§C, 978§E) aimed to form a national movement and attain its objectives of judicial abuse exposure, compensation, and reform. The Program shows that there is a thought-out business plan reasonably calculated to turn a profit. 49. Meantime, I appeal to you to support Judicial Discipline Reform by DONATING through PayPal https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=HBFP5252TB5YJ or at
the GoFundMe campaign at
https://www.gofundme.com/expose-unaccountable-judges-abuse 50. I offer to present this article and the application for venture capital to you and your colleagues at a video conference or in person. You may use the information below to contact me and discuss the presentation's terms and conditions and its scheduling.
Dare trigger history!(†>OL2:953)…and you may enter it.
Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq. Judicial Discipline Reform
2165 Bruckner Blvd.
Bronx, NY 10472-6506
Tel. (718)827-9521
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org https://www.linkedin.com/in/dr-richard-cordero-esq-0508ba4b Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@verizon.net, DrRCordero@Judicial-Discipline-Reform…org, CorderoRic@yahoo.com NOTE: Given the interference with Dr. Cordero's email and e-cloud storage accounts described at *>ggl:1 et seq., when emailing him, copy the above bloc of his email addresses and paste it in the To: line of your email so as to increase the chances of your email reaching him at least at one of those addresses. ****************************