From: "Chiu, David" <david.chiu@...>
To: Aubrey Freedman <aubreyfreedman@...>
Cc: "Chan, Amy" <amy.chan@...>
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 9:59 AM
Subject: RE: Would You Consider Sponsoring a Resolution Against the NDAA?
Aubrey – Want to make sure you’re aware that I’m introducing a resolution today against the NDAA, and holding a press conference at 12:30 pm on City Hall steps. Wasn’t sure if someone had reached out to you and your colleagues, but wanted to let you know personally. Thanks for your initial email.
My aide Amy can send you more information if you’d like.
David
From: Aubrey Freedman [mailto:aubreyfreedman@…]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 11:54 PM
To: Chiu, David
Subject: Re: Would You Consider Sponsoring a Resolution Against the NDAA?
Hi David! Thanks--reading your email made my day! Is there anything we can do to help in the meantime? The Libertarians will be behind your efforts 100%. We hate the NDAA and can't understand why more folks aren't upset about it.
Many Thanks!
Aubrey
<~WRD000.jpg>
From: "Chiu, David" <david.chiu@sfgov.org>
To: "aubreyfreedman@..." <aubreyfreedman@...>
Cc: "Chan, Amy" <amy.chan@...>
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 8:35 PM
Subject: FW: Would You Consider Sponsoring a Resolution Against the NDAA?
Aubrey –
I am talking to some civil rights attorneys about this issue, and am considering sponsoring some version of the resolution. We’ll be in touch.
David
From: Aubrey Freedman [mailto:aubreyfreedman@…]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2013 12:39 AM
To: Chiu, David
Subject: Would You Consider Sponsoring a Resolution Against the NDAA?
Hi Mr. Chiu. As the Chair of the Libertarian Party of San Francisco, I would like to request that you take a look at the attached (and copied below) resolution regarding the NDAA (National Defense Authorization Act) that was signed into law at the end of 2011. We have been very concerned about sections 1021 and 1022 in the NDAA that allow the President almost unlimited authority to order any US citizen or lawful resident alien to be detained indefinitely in prison without charge or trial for "belligerent acts against the United States." With such vague wording, almost any one of us at one time or another could be detained by the military for uttering the wrong words. It isn't enough to say that this President or that President would never give such an order--such power should not ever be available, and that's why we have a Constitution. The NDAA completely goes against the grain of the values of San Francisco, the heart of liberalism, and as a key