URGENT - Call for an LP Statement on Human Rights in the United States on Occasion of Tomorrow's UNHRC Hearing

Dear LNC members,

  I am writing to bring to your attention an event I just learned is happening tomorrow (Friday, Nov. 5, 2010) which I think presents an important opportunity for our party. As the self-proclaimed largest alternative party in the United States, and therefore arguably the country's leading organization of political dissidents, the Libertarian Party is uniquely positioned to issue a statement to the upcoming hearing of the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) on the subject of human rights in the United States.

  The upcoming first-ever participation of the United States in the UNHRC's Universal Periodic Review, and the controversy this is generating (see news article attached below), means this event will likely be a hot topic in the media. An official statement from the Libertarian Party, or even a timely press release, could attract significant attention.

  Unfortunately our current platform is sadly deficient in talking about human rights. Prior to 2006 we could have proudly pointed to this language:

Human Rights
The Issue: We condemn the violations of human rights in all nations around the world. We particularly abhor the widespread and increasing use of torture for interrogation and punishment. The violation of rights and liberty by other governments can never justify foreign intervention by the United States government. Today, no government is innocent of violating human rights and liberty, and none can approach the issue with clean hands.
The Principle: We recognize the right of all people to resist tyranny and defend themselves and their rights. We condemn the use of force, and especially the use of terrorism, against the innocent, regardless of whether such acts are committed by governments or by political or revolutionary groups. Only private individuals and organizations have any place speaking out on this issue.
Solutions: We call upon all the world's governments to fully implement the principles and prescriptions contained in this platform and thereby usher in a new age of international harmony based upon the universal reign of liberty.
Transition: Until a global triumph for liberty has been achieved, we support both political and revolutionary actions by individuals and groups against governments that violate rights. In keeping with our goal of peaceful international relations, we call upon the United States government to cease its hypocrisy and its sullying of the good name of human rights.

  But the only explicit mention of human rights in the LP's 2010 platform occurs in the plank "Property and Contract", which opens with the sentence, "Property rights are entitled to the same protection as all other human rights."

  Of course it scarcely needs stating that many libertarian issues are human rights issues -- abuses in the "War on Drugs" such as SWAT raids, conditions in American prisons, torture, denial of habeas corpus and other abuses in the "War on Terror", human rights violations committed by U.S. military personnel fighting in other countries, excessive use of force by local police departments and other government agencies, the militarization of local police forces and the border with Mexico, the recent FBI raids on peaceful activists opposed to the U.S. government's military involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan, etc.

  Speaking out in a high-profile manner on the issue of human rights in the United States would help correct any mistaken impressions our current platform may be causing that human rights are not an important issue to Libertarians, and I believe would be strongly beneficial to the LP not only in terms of advancing our mission to seek "nothing more nor less than a world set free in our lifetime", but politically as well.

  Every election cycle, discriminatory ballot access rules cost our party large amounts of money, not to mention time and energy. Being unfairly excluded from debates cost our candidates large numbers of votes. Other regulations like BCRA present an undue burden on alternative political parties including our own. Clearly the current pace of reform on these issues -- or lack thereof -- is unacceptable, but we lack the political clout to make rapid change happen on our own. International organizations concerned about rights and democracy could be powerful allies in bringing pressure to bear on these matters. These groups, including but not limited to the United Nations and its agencies, have the potential to internationally embarrass the U.S. federal and state governments over their anti-democratic practices and spur corrective reforms.

  This event in which a UN body will be focused on human rights in the United States presents an excellent opportunity to start making those contacts and beginning that conversation. After we have taken the lead, perhaps we can enlist the cooperation of other alternative parties like the Greens and the Constitution Party.

  Libertarians have long been critical of the United Nations and many of its actions, and rightly so -- by no means should this change! However just as we would not hesitate to appeal local or state level abuses to federal court if necessary, or to alert federal officials to local or state abuses of power, we should not let our feelings about the UN prevent us from using them to advance our cause where we can, playing one arm of the State against another. We need to put the U.S. government on notice that it cannot act with impunity within "its" territory when such actions violate fundamental human rights, and that we intend to help be the eyes and ears of the world with regard to what goes on inside the United States.

  As a member of the Libertarian Party of California, I request that my regional representatives (Doug Craig, Stewart Flood, Daniel Wiener, and Scott Lieberman) respond to this message with your thoughts on the issue, and keep me appraised of any LNC action or discussion related to this issue. Comments and feedback from other members of the Libertarian National Committee are certainly also welcome.

  I hope that the LNC will move to take immediate action by email ballot, or authorize LP staff to do so, as the UN Human Rights Council will be meeting Friday to discuss the human rights record of the United States!

Love & Liberty,
        ((( starchild )))
Outreach Director, Libertarian Party of San Francisco

This State Department press release mentions that "The U.S. report (to the UNHRC) was developed in consultation with a host of U.S. civil society actors and organizations." But probably not the Libertarian Party or other opposition parties (the Republicans and Democrats not being real opposition parties to each other).

http://geneva.usmission.gov/2010/11/02/u-s-delegation-to-the-universal-periodic-review/

  Here is a link to the report, which contains much that is worthy of Libertarian criticism, for its exclusions as well as its inclusions (e.g. the only reference to the massive abuses in the "War on Drugs" comes in a passing mention of concerns about racial profiling):

http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/146379.pdf

Love & Liberty,
        ((( starchild )))

P.S. - I forgot to list Guy McLendon and Brad Ploeger as LNC regional alternates for California.

Thanks, Starchild!

On Behalf Of Starchild
Mary Ruwart; Randy Eshelman; Mark Hinkle; Daniel Wiener; Andy Wolf; Mark
Rutherford; Bill Redpath; David Nolan; Don Wills; Kevin Knedler; Marakay
Rogers; Alicia Mattson; Vicki Kirkland; Carl Vassar; Wayne Allyn Root;
Doug Craig; Stewart Flood; Norman Olsen; Rebecca Sink-Burris; Rachel
Hawkridge; Guy McLendon; Dianna Visek; Wes Benedict
List
Rights in the United States on Occasion of Tomorrow's UNHRC Hearing

Dear LNC members,

            I am writing to bring to your attention an event I just
learned is happening tomorrow (Friday, Nov. 5, 2010) which I think
presents an important opportunity for our party. As the self-proclaimed
largest alternative party in the United States, and therefore arguably
the country's leading organization of political dissidents, the
Libertarian Party is uniquely positioned to issue a statement to the
upcoming hearing of the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) on
the subject of human rights in the United States.

            The upcoming first-ever participation of the United States
in the UNHRC's Universal Periodic Review, and the controversy this is
generating (see news article attached below), means this event will
likely be a hot topic in the media. An official statement from the
Libertarian Party, or even a timely press release, could attract
significant attention.

            Unfortunately our current platform is sadly deficient in
talking about human rights. Prior to 2006 we could have proudly pointed
to this language:

Human Rights

The Issue: We condemn the violations of human rights in all nations
around the world. We particularly abhor the widespread and increasing
use of torture for interrogation and punishment. The violation of rights
and liberty by other governments can never justify foreign intervention
by the United States government. Today, no government is innocent of
violating human rights and liberty, and none can approach the issue with
clean hands.

The Principle: We recognize the right of all people to resist tyranny
and defend themselves and their rights. We condemn the use of force, and
especially the use of terrorism, against the innocent, regardless of
whether such acts are committed by governments or by political or
revolutionary groups. Only private individuals and organizations have
any place speaking out on this issue.

Solutions: We call upon all the world's governments to fully implement
the principles and prescriptions contained in this platform and thereby
usher in a new age of international harmony based upon the universal
reign of liberty.

Transition: Until a global triumph for liberty has been achieved, we
support both political and revolutionary actions by individuals and
groups against governments that violate rights. In keeping with our goal
of peaceful international relations, we call upon the United States
government to cease its hypocrisy and its sullying of the good name of
human rights.

            But the only explicit mention of human rights in the LP's
2010 platform occurs in the plank "Property and Contract", which opens
with the sentence, "Property rights are entitled to the same protection
as all other human rights."

                Of course it scarcely needs stating that many
libertarian issues are human rights issues -- abuses in the "War on
Drugs" such as SWAT raids, conditions in American prisons, torture,
denial of habeas corpus and other abuses in the "War on Terror", human
rights violations committed by U.S. military personnel fighting in other
countries, excessive use of force by local police departments and other
government agencies, the militarization of local police forces and the
border with Mexico, the recent FBI raids on peaceful activists opposed
to the U.S. government's military involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan,
etc.

                Speaking out in a high-profile manner on the issue of
human rights in the United States would help correct any mistaken
impressions our current platform may be causing that human rights are
not an important issue to Libertarians, and I believe would be strongly
beneficial to the LP not only in terms of advancing our mission to seek
"nothing more nor less than a world set free in our lifetime", but
politically as well.

                Every election cycle, discriminatory ballot access rules
cost our party large amounts of money, not to mention time and energy.
Being unfairly excluded from debates cost our candidates large numbers
of votes. Other regulations like BCRA present an undue burden on
alternative political parties including our own. Clearly the current
pace of reform on these issues -- or lack thereof -- is unacceptable,
but we lack the political clout to make rapid change happen on our own.
International organizations concerned about rights and democracy could
be powerful allies in bringing pressure to bear on these matters. These
groups, including but not limited to the United Nations and its
agencies, have the potential to internationally embarrass the U.S.
federal and state governments over their anti-democratic practices and
spur corrective reforms.

                This event in which a UN body will be focused on human
rights in the United States presents an excellent opportunity to start
making those contacts and beginning that conversation. After we have
taken the lead, perhaps we can enlist the cooperation of other
alternative parties like the Greens and the Constitution Party.

                Libertarians have long been critical of the United
Nations and many of its actions, and rightly so -- by no means should
this change! However just as we would not hesitate to appeal local or
state level abuses to federal court if necessary, or to alert federal
officials to local or state abuses of power, we should not let our
feelings about the UN prevent us from using them to advance our cause
where we can, playing one arm of the State against another. We need to
put the U.S. government on notice that it cannot act with impunity
within "its" territory when such actions violate fundamental human
rights, and that we intend to help be the eyes and ears of the world
with regard to what goes on inside the United States.

                As a member of the Libertarian Party of California, I
request that my regional representatives (Doug Craig, Stewart Flood,
Daniel Wiener, and Scott Lieberman) respond to this message with your
thoughts on the issue, and keep me appraised of any LNC action or
discussion related to this issue. Comments and feedback from other
members of the Libertarian National Committee are certainly also
welcome.

                I hope that the LNC will move to take immediate action
by email ballot, or authorize LP staff to do so, as the UN Human Rights
Council will be meeting Friday to discuss the human rights record of the
United States!

Love & Liberty,

                                                ((( starchild )))

Outreach Director, Libertarian Party of San Francisco

-rights-council-is-a-good-thing

Why Scrutiny of the United States at the Human Rights Council is a Good
Thing

November 2, 2010

Mark Leon Goldberg <http://www.undispatch.com/author/un-direct/&gt;

Category: Rights <http://www.undispatch.com/category/rights&gt;

Topics: Critic Watch <http://www.undispatch.com/tag/critic-watch&gt; ,
Human Rights Council
<http://www.undispatch.com/tag/human-rights-council&gt;

On Friday, the human rights record of the United States will be the
subject of a debate
<http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.3fda6adee976b3a33a4faade5f6
c18cd.fb1&show_article=1> at the UN Human Rights Council. The
discussion is happening under the auspices of what is called the
"Universal Periodic Review" in which every UN member state comes under
scrutiny of the council once every four years. Other than a few hours
of discussion, no action is taken.

UN bashers are predictably working themselves into a frenzy about this
apparent affront. After all, there are countries with much worse human
rights records than the United States! And some of these countries will
participate in the discussion on Friday! Pamela Geller
<http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2010/11/the-democrats-w
ar-on-america.html> says President Obama's decision to participate in
the Human Rights Council, is "More proof that he is either an
America-hater or a madman." Israel Matzav says this
<http://israelmatzav.blogspot.com/2010/11/absurd-us-human-rights-record-
to-be.html> is "as absurd as it gets." The Jawa Report
<http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/204720.php&gt; and Astute Bloggers
<http://astuteblogger.blogspot.com/2010/11/mass-murdering-lunatics-runni
ng-un.html> pile on further condemnations.

The thing is, if you actually care about human rights-as opposed to say,
scoring cheap shots against the Obama administration and UN-you ought to
applaud the fact that the United States is participating in the
Universal Periodic Review. This is a mechanism that has led to tangible
improvement of human rights around the world. There are a couple of
exceptions
<Iran in the Spotlight at the Human Rights Council - UN Dispatch

, but for the most part, governments around the world do take

seriously how other countries perceive their commitment to human rights.
When it comes time for their own Universal Periodic Review, they tend to
accelerate progress on certain human rights issues for which they might
otherwise come under criticism.

For example, Human Rights Watch
<http://www.hrw.org/en/news/2009/06/12/un-saudi-arabia-pledges-end-men-s
-control-over-women> notes that a head of its review in June 2009 Saudi
Arabia ended the juvenile death penalty, extended protections to foreign
workers, and made new commitments on women's rights. In an
International Herald Tribune
<http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/03/opinion/03iht-edpickering.html&gt;
op-ed today, the heads of the UN Association of the United States cite
how Ecuador followed up its review by collaborating with the U.N. to
train its police force on human rights and to improve the prison system.

The point is, most countries respond positively to the kind of peer
pressure that the UPR inspires. For this peer pressure to be maximally
effective, the UPR needs the support of everyone, including the United
States. By opening itself up to criticism, the United States is
strengthening the Universal Periodic Review's ability to function as a
catalyst for human rights around the world.

Right on, Mike, thanks for the support. You and anyone else who agrees this is a good idea can help by sending a message to members of the Libertarian National Committee and national executive director Wes Benedict, urging them to act on my suggestion. The sooner the better, since this is a time-sensitive issue!

  Here are their email addresses:

jwlark@..., Brad.Ploeger@..., james@..., scott73@..., dankarlan@..., mary@..., mark@..., Randy.Eshelman@..., wiener@..., Andrew.Wolf@..., vicechair@..., wredpath@...m, wes.benedict@..., davidfnolan@..., Don.Wills@..., Kevin.Knedler@..., Vicki.Kirkland@..., agmattson@..., Marakay.Rogers@..., rootintl@..., Doug.Craig@..., lib203@..., sff@ivo.net, Norman.Olsen@..., Lpwa.com1@..., rebecca.sinkburris@gmail.com, guy@..., Dianna.Visek@...

Love & Liberty,
        ((( starchild )))