Trump's position has been focused on following the law, as it is written today and as it was written when it was written.
Meanwhile, Trump's critics have been a rogue government and advocates of lawless and criminal conduct.
I wound not go so far as to say criminal, but I have to agree with the general idea.
I would also add that talk of impeachment or other means of removal for "tyrannical" acts is a slippery slope I do not concur with. I would instead ask, did this official commit an offense which the law clearly states is impeachable?
Marcy
I gave an example, Marcy. If that kind of tyranny isn't cause for removing a president from office even among Libertarians, we're in sad shape. The law (the Constitution) simply says "treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors".
Love & Liberty,
((( starchild )))