HI All, Yesterday I attended a meeting in which residents of several
Bay Area counties gathered to discuss the current Bay Area land use
situation. This group can be described
as pro-local control of land use, anti-regionalisms, and anti-federalism. They are not interested in Plan Bay Area
unelected bureaucrats telling them what to do, or HUD imposing its new AFFH Act
(if you don’t know what that is, you will be surprised when it affects you), or
BARF using the courts to tell them what they can or cannot build.
The group’s disdain for BARF (Bay Area Renters Federation,
founded by Sonja Trauss, one of the panelist at the LPSF 2015 Tax Day, and a
very engaging person) was searing. Here
is the group’s point. Although local
neighborhood covenants would be infinitely preferable to zoning, today’s
California does not have that luxury.
The battle for control of turf has escalated to the point that zoning is
the new battle cry. Neighborhoods claim
they should decide what their living space looks like. Subsidized housing advocates claim neighborhoods
should not. The U.S. Supreme Court
agrees with the subsidized housing activists (Texas Department of Housing vs.
the Inclusive Community Project) and so does Obama and HUD (Affirmatively
Furthering Fair Housing Act).
A couple of attendees who reside in San Francisco reported
that a group of past City officials who side with the local control crowd is
forming and are getting ready to do some damage to the subsidized housing advocates.
So, why am I posting all this here? Because I am suggesting (as I have been doing
for a while) that LPSF develop some positions on this matter. To simply say “We are for the free market!”
or “We are opposed to zoning!” is irrelevant at this point. We no longer have even a semblance of a free
market in San Francisco, zoning is a reality, and the Brown Shirts from higher
up are serious about telling us exactly what our neighborhoods should look like. When we discuss ballot measures, in my view,
we should have more awareness of the many issues surrounding each measure. Same when we look at candidates, or at other
groups.
BTW, San Francisco has a high percentage of folks of Asian
descent. At the meeting the question was
raised whether to abide by the AFFH Act, the City will need to ship some of
these residents elsewhere, ship in more whites and blacks, prohibit any more
people of Asian descent from coming into the City, or what. This is the kind of stuff that the City and its residents will need to deal with.
Here is an SFGate article on the BARF lawsuit:
http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/City-activists-brazen-new-battle-cry-Sue-the-6485289.php
Marcy