Thanks, Jeremy. I found it online.
Best, Michael
But you're not telling us where:
http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB118852395739814099-9hV_ZN2XI_llqS
TJrGfxurkisa4_20070929.html, or http://tinyurl.com/32rkxq. Paul is not
listed as in favor of gay marriage, but of civil unions. He is also
identified as favoring a U.S.-Mexico border fence.
Whoa! That's really bizarre. I am sitting here holding the paper version of the WSJ in front of me right now, and the text says "Gay Marriage," not "Civil Unions." They must have corrected it online. Weird...
Jeremy
That's unfortunate confirmation that the correction was important to
someone in the campaign.
There could be other explanations, but yours sounds as likely as any. It would be bitterly ironic if it was later found that transplants from the Libertarian Party like Joe Seehusen (a former LP executive director identified in the WSJ article as a Ron Paul deputy campaign manager, and I believe part of the generally "pragmatist"-leaning national LP leadership) were influencing Dr. Paul to be more cautious and less outspokenly libertarian than he otherwise would.
Love & Liberty,
<<< starchild >>>