Prop 64

Sarosh wrote:

Does 64 abridge freedom of speech as expressed by filing a

"frivolous"

lawsuit? Who is the trusted person who decides what law suit is

frivolous?

IN MY OPINION, ITS FRIVOLOUS IF THE COST OF THE LAWSUIT EXCEEDS 30%

OF

Here's the problem: you're not the person who will be making these
decisions. If you were, then the law would accomplish exactly what
you wish it to. However, once the politicians get hold of it, it gets
twisted and distorted to benefit their special interest.

May I recommend this Harry Browne article on the subject:
      http://www.harrybrowne.org/articles/SellingLiberty.htm

Best, Michael

In case you missed it, here are the transcripts of the program NOW (on
PBS). The 3rd party candidates were interviewed after the October 6th
debates. It's a good read:
http://www.pbs.org/now/printable/transcript341_full_print.html

-Kevin-

Kevin-

True, 'tis a good read; but after reading through the transcript, I
am fickle enough to speak the truth as I see it: Badnarik was the
least rhetoritician and politician of the bunch, even if he had the
best politics.

Please, please, brethren, and sistren, learn to show you understand
the world as your audience sees it, and learn to speak to- and choose-
a stance in values in human affairs!

ss Liberty,

Jeanine Ring {))(*)((}

--- In lpsf-discuss@yahoogroups.com, "Kevin O'Neal" <onealk@t...>
wrote:

In case you missed it, here are the transcripts of the program NOW

(on

PBS). The 3rd party candidates were interviewed after the October

6th