Mike,
*I'm* not personally claiming the high ground -- we're talking about the U.S. government and the Beijing regime, not about ourselves as individual moral agents. Neither authority is "mine" -- I don't have a horse in this fight aside from my disinterested evaluation of the two organizations on their respective records.
If anything, my natural tendency would be a bias against the U.S. government. After all, various government entities in this country, local, state and federal, have violated my rights in many different ways. They are robbing me on an ongoing basis, they prosecuted me for trying to make an honest living, deny me numerous economic and quality of life opportunities through their mounds of crushing regulations and bureaucracy, and are violating or attempting to violate various of my civil liberties.
By contrast, the Chinese regime based in Beijing has negatively impacted *my* life much less. Its authoritarianism mainly affects me, as far as I know, only marginally insofar as it reduces my opportunities for a better life and greater prosperity secondhand via its harsh impositions on the people under its control.
Yet when I compare USgov, against which I have every personal reason to feel animosity, to the regime that rules China, I have little doubt which is preferable in libertarian terms, and which form of political control I would prefer to live under. I think most people make the same judgment, and that this is reflected in the pattern of migration between China and the United States -- almost all of it from the former to the latter and very little the other way around.
You describe the winners of the recent Taiwanese election as "pro-China." Are you sure this is accurate? While I do not have your first-hand experience, my impression as a reader of international news has been that one leading party is more pro-independence, while the other sticks more to the longstanding Kuomintang claim that Taiwan's government is the legitimate government of all China, but that neither is pro-communist or wants to put Taiwan's population under the jurisdiction of the Beijing regime. As to the respective popularity of the authorities in Beijing and Taipei, it was the Beijing regime that has had to bloodily put down a popular uprising in 1989 to maintain its single-party grip on power, while Chiang Kai-Shek's successors instead embraced multiparty democracy. The fact that people in Taiwan complain as much about the authorities that have direct sway over them as do people in China (if this is a fact), is not necessarily a good yardstick for measuring the relative popularity of the two.
Finally, as always, I do not see the government in Washington, D.C., as "ours," nor do I see the United States as "our" backyard. And I don't think our advocacy for the freedom of people in other parts of the world should be held hostage to whether or not we have managed to secure freedom closer to where we live. That would be like admonishing me for being nice to strangers on the grounds that I am not nice to members of my family.
Love & Liberty,
((( starchild )))