Goodall Estate Case Not Going Well

Discussion
1

The Case of Chess Philanthropist and Organizer Mike Goodall is not going
well.

You can look at the case file here:

http://webaccess.sftc.org/Scripts/Magic94/mgrqispi94.dll?APPNAME=IJS&PRGNAME=ROA22&ARGUMENTS=-APTR99273030

On April 21, 2011 The Bank of America sued the Goodall Estate in San
Francisco Probate Court, claiming that the entire Goodall Estate including
the Goodall Mansion located at 461 Peachstone Terrace, San Rafael
California should be donated to a charity, Guide Dogs for the Blind.

This claim is entirely bogus and utterly without basis. They have not
produced even one document or cited even one case that supports their
claims.

One suspects that they already gave the Goodall money to Guide Dogs for the
Blind and cannot get it back.

Lately they have been claiming that under a statute of limitations it is
too late for the Goodall Estate to challenge the "gift" of the Goodall
Estate to the Guide Dogs.

This claim is unspeakably absurd and ridiculous. As the case file shows,
Mike Goodall has been suing Bank of America over this since December 21,
1999.

Nevertheless, Bank of America has nine attorneys representing two of the
biggest law firms in San Francisco fighting against me, Sam Sloan, over
this $2.5 million estate.

Now, I just learned from Bowman Liu, Records Clerk in the San Francisco
Superior Court Records Room, that the judge in this case on October 19,
2012 ordered the case file to be brought up from the archives warehouse to
be ready for the next hearing date, which is October 29, 2012. This proves
what I have long suspected that the San Francisco judges have been ruling
in favor of Bank of America without even looking at the case file !!!! Had
they been looking at the case file and especially at the documents filed in
this case in 1999 and 2000, they would have seen right away that Bank of
America has no case at all and that their claims are utterly without basis.

This is probably the ultimate and most extreme example of corruption and
incompetence in the courts.

Sam Sloan

2

Sent to my buddy who is CFO for Guide Dogs for the Blind.

Mike

3

Thank you for forwarding this to your buddy, the CFO for Guide Dogs for the
Blind.

Since you have done that, you should do him a further favor by alerting him
to the fact that it is not merely a question that he and his organization
might not get the paltry sum of $2.5 million that he hopes to get from this
court case.

It is more than that because your CFO friend stands to lose his liberty and
to go to prison for his covering up the crime of forgery.

Because we can and will prove that Col. Goodall never signed the supposed
trust and the trust document is a forgery.

Even though it was just an agent of Guide Dogs for the Blind who tried to
get the death bed signature of Col. Goodall and, failing that, forged his
signature to get control of the $2.5 million, we can not only prove this
but also prove that your CFO friend knows that it is a forgery and for that
reason refuses to produce the trust document thereby preventing us from
proving this.

First, it is inconceivable that Col. Goodall, a meticulous and detailed
man, would write his only child out of his estate on his death bed. It is
much more likely that the agent for Guide Dogs for the Blind who gets
commissions and fees for getting the death bed signature would forge the
signature, knowing that Col. Goodall was hospitalized and at the point of
death.

Now, we have recently discovered a power of attorney signed by Col. Goodall
on the same date, which was August 25, 1994, just 17 days before he died on
September 10, 1994.

Here is the known signature of Col. Goodall and his wife Rachel.

Now compare that with the signatures on the supposed trust signed on the
same date:

While they might look similar the handwriting expert we have retained, who
also does this work for the FBI, has blown up the signatures and looked at
them with a microscope and says that there are significant differences. For
example, Col. Kenneth F. Goodall signed the FG in his name with one
sweeping movement, as follows:

Now look at a blowup of the FG of the signature on the supposed trust:

By looking at these signatures along with a dozen other known signatures of
Col. Goodall on checks and the like our forensic handwriting expert was
able to determine that Col. Goodall always signed the FG with one sweeping
movement from left to right and his pen never left the paper.

On the other hand, the FG on the supposed trust was written with three
strokes of the pen and the top stroke was right to left, not left to right.

Also, as you can plainly see, the entire supposed signature on the trust
was halting and shaky, not like the fluid signature of a man who was used
to signing his name many times.

All of this is known to your CFO Buddy. Thus, he already knows that he is
using a forged instrument to get the $2.5 million even if he did not commit
the forgery himself.

The bright side of this is that the prison system offers free food, because
that is where your CFO Friend and all of the directors and officers of
Guide Dogs for the Blind will be, in prison, if justice is ever done on
this case.

Sam Sloan
Administrator of the Estate of Mike Goodall

(Attachment signature-on-durable-power.jpg is missing)

(Attachment signature-supposed-on-goodall-trust.jpg is missing)

(Attachment FG-signature-on-power-of-attorney.jpg is missing)

(Attachment FG-signature-on-purported-trust.jpg is missing)