[ba-liberty] Transgender Day of Remembrance Nov. 20, SF

I'm looking for help in writing some outreach material for the local
gay community in Laguna Beach. Unfortunately, in a place where
nearly 25% of the adults are gay and nearly 50% of the adult men
are gay, I have yet to find any Libertarians.

I'm not extremely discouraged by that, since I know my job as an
activist, officer times two and a candidate is one of education.
I just need a place to begin.

What are the main issues I should focus on? Especially those
in contrast to the gay community's usual political home, the Democratic Party.

I think I can do pretty well with the solutions to the issues
and framing our positions. I just want to know where to focus.

Any other ideas, suggestions and commentary welcome.

Bruce Cohen
LPCA Board of Directors
LPOC Board of Directors
Libertarian US Congressional Candidate

Bruce,

  I applaud your initiative. Although issues are important, the manner in which you go about your activism will probably make more difference than which particular issues you choose. For instance, try dressing in drag and handing out condoms at a bar, bath house, or circuit party along with your fliers.

  Here's an idea for a gay outreach flier: A picture of a good-looking guy's butt with the caption "Nice Ass," next to a picture of a donkey labeled "Democratic Party" and the caption "Not Nice Ass." Underneath the photos, the words "Tell the politicians you won't kiss their ass any more. Vote Libertarian!" I'm sure you can think of some good text for a message on the flip side, but let me know if you decide to do it and could use further suggestions.

Yours in liberty,
                <<< Starchild >>>

I'm looking for help in writing some outreach material for the local
gay community in Laguna Beach. Unfortunately, in a place where
nearly 25% of the adults are gay and nearly 50% of the adult men
are gay, I have yet to find any Libertarians.

I'm not extremely discouraged by that, since I know my job as an
activist, officer times two and a candidate is one of education.
I just need a place to begin.

What are the main issues I should focus on? Especially those
in contrast to the gay community's usual political home, the Democratic Party.

I think I can do pretty well with the solutions to the issues
and framing our positions. I just want to know where to focus.

Any other ideas, suggestions and commentary welcome.

Bruce Cohen
LPCA Board of Directors
LPOC Board of Directors
Libertarian US Congressional Candidate

From: "Starchild" <sfdreamer@earthlink.net>
To: <webmaster@...>
Cc: "LPSF List" <lpsf-discuss@yahoogroups.com>; "Bay Area Liberty" <ba-liberty@yahoogroups.com>; <NorCalLibertarians@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 12:01 AM
Subject: [lpsf-discuss] Re: [ba-liberty] Transgender Day of Remembrance Nov. 20, SF

> Jeff,
>
> Who said anything about "special privileges?" That is the code-phrase
> that right-wingers typically use any time an argument of equal rights
> for sexual minorities comes up, since they can't muster any real
> argument against all adult human beings having equal rights under the
> law.
>
> Indeed you are right that government should not recognize or
> discriminate against any persons. This means no restricting marriage to
> certain combinations of persons, no race, gender, or sexual preference
> check boxes on forms, and no government facilities segregated on the
> basis of gender. Especially when government is trying to force someone
> to identify with a gender which is not the individual's gender of
> choice.
>
> As the Advocates for Self-government might put it: Who should decide
> which gender you belong to, you or the government?
>
> Yours in liberty,
> <<< Starchild >>>
>
> >> Since government still fuels perceptions that transgendered
> >> individuals are second-class citizens by legally discriminating
> >> against
> >> them,
> >
> > Your premise is false from a libertarian perspective.
> > Libertarians should seek to remove the government from
> > officially *recognizing or discriminating* against
> > any person or persons. That does not mean special
> > government privileges for certain persons, married,
> > gay, straight, or whatever. It means getting the
> > government out of the business of registering,
> > licensing or otherwise regulating these lifestyle
> > choices in the first place. The first principle
> > of libertarians ought to be that government is not
> > the answer, and that private, voluntary solutions are
> > far better than using the coercive force of government
> > to enforce some pet social policy or enact some social
> > change.
> >
> > Starchild, you frequently seem to take the position
> > that government *is* the answer, so I question your
> > understanding of libertarianism.
> >
> > Yes, I know this is one of those "you're not libertarian
> > enough" messages that everyone hates, but it needs to
> > be said.
> >
> > Jeff C.
> >
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
> Rent DVDs from home.
> Over 14,500 titles. Free Shipping
> & No Late Fees. Try Netflix for FREE!
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/I3w.vC/hP.FAA/3jkFAA/69cplB/TM
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> lpsf-discuss-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.515 / Virus Database: 313 - Release Date: 9/2/2003

<image.tiff>

You could point them to the LP press releases to get a feel for the LPs stance on gay issues.
A search on Google for: "LP press release" gay site:www.lp.org
turns up 11 results. Here are the headlines of the ones specifically on gay issues:

- [2002] Tax-funded seniors center for gays is insult to conservative Christians
- [1998] Yes, Boy Scouts should have the right to bar homosexuals, Libertarians argue
- [1998] The only real solution to hate crimes? Equal justice for all, say Libertarians
- [1998] San Francisco's race-based student reading lists show why public schools are failing, say Libertarians
- [1999] Religion versus equality: Can landlords "discriminate" against unwed couples?
- [1997] Heterosexual "sexual harassment" among men creates flurry of silly lawsuits, say Libertarians
- [1996] Reject "Defense of Marriage Act," Libertarians Urge Congress

Unfortunately, only the last two give an impression that I think most gays will find pro-gay. The rest will likely be perceived (fairly or not) as anti-gay and increasingly so from 1999 to the present.

-- Steve

You have a very good point, Steve. It is worse from 1999 on. I
noticed a similar trend when using the LP.org's own site search few
weeks ago, but I thought I was imagining it.

I used to think that my disgust with the Libertarian Party around the
1999-2000 timeframe was really disgust with the Tennessee LP. I
figured that would end when I moved to California in September 2000.
Ends up that it was just wishful thinking on my part. Never in my
wildest dreams when I joined the LP in 1996 did I ever think I'd be
teaming up with someone named Starchild to be defending tranny rights
in the California LP. Hello! Middle-class suburban Southern white
guy engineer M.B.A. here whose only interesting thing about him is
that he has a boyfriend -- and even that's effectively become a
boring old "marriage" by now. After a decade of being identified and
self-identifying as a conservative, someone please tell me when I
became the left-winger trying to pull the LP to the center (top) of
the chart.

I have a theory. I think it's that the LP moved to the right long
before I joined the Party in 1996. However, their platform was
technically inclusive of LGBT equality. But since this was before
Ellen came out (seems so long ago), and nobody was taking things like
gay marriage seriously, there didn't need to be press releases on the
topic. The LP basically ignored LGBT issues altogether, save for a
couple lines in the platform. Then, all of the sudden, queers
started making news. So, the LP had to start putting out press
releases and making public comments on legislation. And that's when
we got to see the real bias in the LP leadership.

If not for guys like Mike Acree who joined the LP before I was born
telling me that the Party actually used to be inclusive, I'd think it
was always on the homophobic side.

Rob

- -----Original Message-----