Will the people deciding how government-owned open space is used hear any libertarian input? If you attend one of these forums, here are a few ideas for topics to bring up:
-Make it easier and less expensive for people to hold dance parties, festivals, art events, etc., on government-owned open space
-Make it easier for people to create art and beautify these areas without government approval
-Make it easier and less expensive for developers to build on these land parcels
-Divert city funding for various homeless programs and services to building mini Jim Reid 10' by 10' houses for the homeless on these land parcels (according to number-crunching I did a while back, one of these homes could be built and given to every homeless person in the city for less than the city spends in a year on programs and services for the homeless)
-The city government should regularly publish a list of all the land parcels it owns, including parks, buildings, etc., with the size and estimated market value of each parcel, who is responsible for upkeep and finding productive uses for the land, and for what if anything it's currently being used
Love & Liberty,
((( starchild )))