Dear Clay,
I'm concerned with the tone in your response to Phil (see below) and a host of other past postings of yours with a similar insulting tone.
Is there anything we can do to prevail upon you to address us with the respect and camaraderie with which we address you and each other? I'd love to hear your thoughts.
I suggest you attend our monthly meeting so we can talk in the flesh. This may go a long way toward you feeling more kinship with your fellow LPSFers.
Does anyone else have any suggestions?
Best, Michael
I treat global warming deniers the same way you'd treat people who
wanted to teach creationism or flat-earthism or
holocaust-didn't-happenism to your kids. I'll just quit discussing
this particular issue, and stick to ones that aren't so unfathomably
infuriating to me.
See you at the next meeting, when I put little mind control devices on
your heads and make you vote to change to Range Voting...using Range
Voting.
Regards,
Clay
Dear Clay,
I'm concerned with the tone in your response to Phil (see below) and
a host of other past postings of yours with a similar insulting tone.
Is there anything we can do to prevail upon you to address us with
the respect and camaraderie with which we address you and each other?
I'd love to hear your thoughts.
I suggest you attend our monthly meeting so we can talk in the
flesh. This may go a long way toward you feeling more kinship with
your fellow LPSFers.
Does anyone else have any suggestions?
Best, Michael
From: brokenladdercalendar
To: lpsf-discuss@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 8:59 PM
Subject: [lpsf-discuss] Re: re global warming
>
> Phil,
>
> I suggest you edit it and send it to www.LewRockwell.com for
publication.
>
> Best, Michael
Why would they publish such a scientifically empty piece of total
raving nonsense, written without the slightest concern for the massive
data in support of the CO2-GW link? I see no reason why the author
deserves anything but mandatory classes on
chemistry/physics/meteorology.